| Annotation: | Methods. In the process of tracing the life cycle of industrial enterprises through the phases of life, methods of analysis and synthesis, empirical methods, methods of induction and deduction, graphical and logical methods, and the method of analysis have been used, as well as scientificeconomic and statistical analysis. The methodological basis of the research is the index method, the results of which allow us to evaluate the life cycle of enterprises according to the phases of life cycle, which is the basis of cluster polyvector models of development transparency. Results. The article improves the structural and functional model of building an integrated adaptive-relevant system for evaluating the life cycle of an enterprise by phases of viability, which synthesizes a complex system of executing tactical actions, is implemented on the basis of receiving information from the object's local phases of the enterprise's viability, performs the functions of recognition and identification compatibility of phases of viability with the level of development of the enterprise, which allows industrial enterprises to achieve the maximum permissible level of transparency of development under the condition of effective formation of cluster polyvector models for the purpose of forecasting and eliminating discrepancies in goals and strategic directions of development management, forming the concept of viability of industrial enterprises. Novelty. It consists in improving the scientific and methodological foundations of the development of a structural-functional model of an integrated adaptive-relevant system for evaluating the life cycle of an enterprise by phases of viability. Practical value. Assessing the life cycle of an enterprise by phases of viability as a basis for building cluster polyvector models of transparency of development allows to form a system of parameterization of its activity, which is an analytical tool to organize vertical and horizontal connections of a multi-level and multifunctional management decision-making system, taking into account the properties of interdependent influence and establishing critical points for the most significant security parameters of individual trajectories of transparent development. |
| Literature: | - 1. Bagstad K.J., Shammin M.R. 2012. Can the Genuine Progress Indicator better inform sustainable regional progress?-A case study for Northeast Ohio. Ecological Indicators, 18, 330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.11.026
- 2. Bezuhla, J., Kononenko, Ya., Bytiak, O., Zacharchyn, H., Korin, M. Renovation and sustainable development of the industrial energy enterprise: economic and legal management mechanism / IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 628(1)
- 3. Bezuhla, J.E. Scenarios of enterprises economic activity development /Actual Problems of Economics, 2015, 170(8), 402-408
- 4. Danilishin B., Veklich O. 2010. Genuine progress indicator as an adequate macroeconomic indicator of public welfare. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 21, 644.
- 5. Desruelle P. The "Innovation Radar": A New Policy Tool to Support Innovation Management / Paul Desruelle, Daniel Nepelski // 45th Research Conference on Communication, Infor mation and Internet Policy (TPRC 45) (September0809, 2017, Arlington). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2944104.
- 6. Forsman H. Innovation capacity and in novation development in small enterprises. A com parison between the manufacturing and service sectors / H. Forsman // Research Policy. - 2011. - Vol. 40, Issue 5. - P. 739-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.003
- 7. Hassan Ali Al-Ababneh and Salem A.S. Alrhaimi. 2020. Modern Approaches to Education Management to Ensure the Quality of Educational Services. Available at: https://www.temjournal.com/content/92/TEMJournalMay2020_770_778.pdf
- 8. Horng J.S. Creativity, aesthetics and eco friendliness: A physical dining environment design synthetic assessment model of innovative resta urants / Horng J.S., Chou S.F., Liu C.H., Tsai C.Y. // Tourism Management. - 2013. - Vol. 36. - P. 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.11.002
- 9. Khabibullin R. I. 2018. Modern trends in the development of cooperation (Science and education issues), No 14 (26) P 5. https://doi.org/10.32070/ec.v9i40.30
- 10. Khabibullin R. I. and Kleiner G. B. and Dementyev V. E. 2017. Collective forms of management in the modern economy. 356 p.
- 11. Lawn Philip The failure of the ISEW and GPI to fully account for changes in human-health capital - A methodological shortcoming not a theoretical weakness. Ecological Economics, Elsevier. 2013. (88), 167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.028
- 12. Prokhorova, V., Protsenko, V., Bezuglaya, Y., Us, J. The optimization algorithm for the directions of influence of risk factors on the system that manages the potential of machinebuilding enterprises / Eastern- European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2018, 4(1-94), 6-13 https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.139513
- 13. Pylypenko, H.M. (2013). Cultural impact on the ratio of public and market coordination in Ukraine. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (3), 118.
|
Archive