Economic Bulletin of the National Mining University

 

IssuesSectionsAuthorsKeywords

Article

Issue:2024 №3 (87)
Section:Economics of enterprise
UDK:658:330.341
DOI:https://doi.org/10.33271/ebdut/87.169
Article language:Ukrainian
Pages:169-178
Title:Methodical approach to assessing the corporate responsibility of enterprises in the conditions of business innovation
Author:Hovsieiev D. D., National Aviation University
Annotation:Methods. The theoretical-methodological approach proposed in this article involves the implementation of the procedure for assessing the corporate responsibility of an enterprise based on an infological methodical approach using a semantic network at the stage of selecting significant indicators of social responsibility. This makes it possible to simplify and logically substantiate the procedure for determining the optimal composition of the necessary indicators. Directly integrated indicator of the level of corporate responsibility was obtained based on the use of the Microsoft Excel application package. Results. It is noted that in today's dynamic environment, where technologies are developing at an incredible speed, the business environment is undergoing radical changes through the introduction of advanced technologies, which open up opportunities for enterprises for economic growth and increasing the efficiency of their operation. The implementation of the principles of corporate responsibility and innovation in business processes is associated with the need for significant investments and changes in corporate culture, which encourages enterprises to pay attention to corporate responsibility as a key factor for achieving sustainable development in conditions of innovation. An indicator of the company's corporate responsibility assessment was obtained, which is based on five group integral indicators characterizing relations with the staff and owners of enterprises, operational efficiency, financial reliability and investment attractiveness for corporate clients. Novelty. An integral indicator of the level of corporate responsibility and management decision-making regarding the use of means of increasing economic stability and further sustainable development of the enterprise in conditions of innovation has been formed. Practical value. The use of the formed integral indicator for assessing corporate responsibility is justified and corresponds to the presented approach to defining the concept of corporate responsibility as a comprehensive one, which covers all spheres of the enterprise's activity and levels of interaction with various stakeholders. This allows getting a more complete picture of its social responsibility and reflects the interests of a certain group of stakeholders (employees, owners, customers, etc.). Group integral indicators are based on the application of a system of indicators that allow you to objectively measure the components of the enterprise's corporate responsibility, establish the dynamics and relationship of general and individual trends of economic stability and sustainable development. 
Keywords:Enterprise, Corporate responsibility, Stakeholders, Approach, Business innovation
File of the article:EV20243_169-178.pdf
Literature:
  • 1. Arefieva, O.V., & Kovalenko, N.V. (2022) Strategichni oriyentyry sotsialno-vidpovidalnoho biznesu v umovakh zelenoi ekonomiky. Elektronne naukove fakhove vydannya «Adaptyvne upravlinnya: teoriya i praktyka», Ser «Ekonomika», Issue 13, (26). Retrieved from https://amtp.org.ua/index.php/journal2/article/view/482 https://doi.org/10.33296/2707-0654-14(28)-02
  • 2. Arefieva, O.V., Arefiev, S.O., & Zyz, D.O. (2021). Adaptyvne upravlinnia kapitalizatsiieiu intelektualnoho potentsialu pidpryiemstva. Infrastruktura rynku, (61), 58-65. https://doi.org/10.32843/infrastruct61-11
  • 3. Borshch, V., & Zhmai, O. (2021). Analiz korporatyvnoi sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti pidpryemstv energetychnoi sfery Ukrainy v konteksti tsiley staloho rozvytku OON. Rynkova ekonomika: suchasna teoriya i praktyka upravlinnya, 20(1(47), 70-97. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.18524/2413-9998.2021.1(47).226927
  • 4. Bocharova, N.A, & Shchepylina, A.K. (2018). Integralna otsinka rivnya korporatyvnoyi sotsialnoyi vidpovidalnosti pidpryiemstva. Ekonomika transportnoho kompleksu, (31), 45, 45-62. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.30977/ETK.2225-2304.2018.31.0.45
  • 5. Budko, O.V., & Galatov, B.M. (2023). Korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist yak instrument biznes-strategiyi rozvytku pidpryyemstv. Ekonomika ta upravlinnya pidpryyemstvamy, 1(3), 49-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31319/2709-2879.2023iss1(6).282985pp49-57
  • 6. Vakhrusheva, O.B., & Khakhonova, N.N. (2022). Otsinka efektyvnosti korporatyvnoi sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti [Evaluation of the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility]. Intelekt. Innovatsii. Investytsii, (3), 20-27.
  • 7. Yevtushenko, V.A. (2013). Otsinka korporatyvnoi sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti: metody, obiekty, pokaznyky. [Assessment of corporate social responsibility: methods, objects, indicators.]. Visnyk NTU “KhPI”. No. 46 (1019). pp. 53-63. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vcpitp_2013_46_8.
  • 8. Melnykova, O.A. (2023). Problemy vprovadzhennya ta otsinky efektyvnosti korporatyvnoi sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti.. Vcheni zapysky: zb. nauk. pr. Kyiv: KNEU, Issue 31, 156-172. https://ir.kneu.edu.ua/handle/2010/42036
  • 9. Orlova, N.V., & Zhmai, O.V. (2020). Otsinka korporatyvnoi sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti v sistemi vzayemovidnosyn zi steykholderamy. Rynkova ekonomika: suchasna teoriya i praktyka upravlinnia,
  • 19(2(45), 169-187. https://doi.org/10.18524/2413-9998.2020.2(45).201429
  • 10. Pysmenna, O.O., Somova, L.I., & Papusha, Ye. (2018). Intehralna otsinka korporatyvnoi sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti promyslovoho pidpryyemstva. Ekonomika i suspilstvo, Issue 19, 548-551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2018-19-84
  • 11. Iarmosh, O., Prokhorova, V., Shcherbyna, I., Kashaba, O., & Slastianykova, K. (2021). Innovativeness of the creative economy as a component of the Ukrainian and the world sustainable development strategy. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 628(1). Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85100727399&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f
  • 12. Korytko, T., Piletska, S, Arefieva, O, Pidhora, Ye, & Pryimakova, Yu. (2020). Formation of organizational and economic mechanism of motivation of increase of investment activity of the enterprise. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice,. 4(35), 418-425. Retrieved from doi:10.1088/1755-1315/628/1/012042
  • 13. Korytko, T., Piletska, S., & Bohutska, O. (2022). Mechanizm zarządzania potencjałem innowacyjnym przedsiębiorstw w warunkach gospodarki cyfrowej. Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej w Poznaniu, Issue 97, (2), 71-80 https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.2113
  • 14. Lepeyko, T., Lohinova, K., & Omarov, E. (2023). Enhancing enterprise management systems through conflict management technologies. Development Service Industry Management, (3). DOI:10.31891/dsim-2023-3(12)
  • 15. Piletska, S., & Arefiev, S. (2020). The mechanism of corporate management of the enterprise financial capacity. Journal of corporate responsibility and leadership, Vol. 7, Issue 4, 43-58. Retrieved from http://jcrl.umk.pl/journal/archive
  • 16. Pohrebniak, A., Arefieva, O., Arefiev, S., Boiarynova, K., & Davydenko, V. (2021). Management of Attracting Investment Resources of Enterprises to Ensure Their Economic Security in Circular Economy. International Journal of computer science and network security, Volume 21, Issue 10, 302-309. DOI:10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.10.43.
  • 17. Popelo, O., Arefiev, S., Rogulska, O., Rudnitska, K., & Derevianko, D. (2022). Higher education as a determinant of sustainable development. Journal of the University of Zulia, 13(38), 734-746. https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.38.40