| Annotation: | Methods. The methodological foundation of the study is based on a set of complementary methods that ensured the achievement of the stated research objective. The method of comparative analysis was applied to juxtapose accounting and budgeting models used in international public– private partnership (PPP) practices and to identify their points of integration and divergence. Systems analysis was employed to construct the author’s strategic integration model «4D-Govern» and to differentiate the roles, instruments, and principles of accounting and budgeting across each stage of the PPP project lifecycle. Risk analysis and scenario modelling techniques formed the basis for examining the financial obligations of the parties (including hidden and deferred liabilities) in budget planning and accounting. Institutional analysis was used to substantiate the problem of incompatibility between fragmented managerial decisions and the long-term nature of PPPs. Results. A conceptual approach to the strategic integration of accounting and budgeting practices into the project cycle of PPPs has been substantiated, taking into account the phased implementation of partnership projects and the roles of key stakeholders. Contemporary international approaches to accounting and budgeting within PPP frameworks have been analyzed, revealing key points of convergence and identifying substantial gaps. The study explored how financial obligations of the parties – particularly hidden or deferred commitments – are reflected in accounting and budget planning throughout the PPP lifecycle. It was established that insufficient disclosure of such obligations increases the risks of budgetary opacity, future fiscal burden, and diminished accountability of the public partner. A model of strategic integration of accounting and budgeting practices has been proposed, incorporating principles of managerial responsibility, transparency, control, and adaptability at all stages of project implementation – from initiation to completion. Novelty. A model of strategic integration of accounting and budgeting practices has been developed, encompassing all stages of PPP implementation – from initiation to completion – and based on the principles of managerial responsibility, transparency, control, and adaptability. Its conceptual foundation is formed by four governance principles: Direction, Disclosure, Discipline, and Dynamics, which together establish a comprehensive framework for ensuring effective financial support throughout the PPP project cycle. Practical value. The proposed model of strategic integration of accounting and budgeting practices into the PPP project cycle has practical significance for shaping institutional mechanisms of financial transparency, accountability, and effective risk allocation. It can serve as an analytical tool for improving approaches to planning, monitoring, and evaluating partnership projects in both public and corporate governance. |
| Literature: | - 1. Shuliuk, B.S. (2021). Kontsesiia yak forma realizatsii proiektiv derzhavno-pryvatnoho partnerstva v Ukraini ta sviti. Biznes Inform, (2), 56-61. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2021-2-56-61
- 2. Vashev, O.Ye., Khizhniak, S.V., & Khizhniak, K.V. (2024). Pravovi mekhanizmy rozvytku derzhavno-pryvatnoho partnerstva u sferi okhorony zdorovia. Teoriia ta praktyka derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 2(79), 314-327. http://doi.org/10.26565/1727-6667-2024-2-15
- 3. Olshanskyi, O. (2025). Derzhavno-pryvatne partnerstvo yak suchasnyi instrument ekonomichnoi modernizatsii. Publichne upravlinnia: kontseptsii, paradyhma, rozvytok, udoskonalennia, (11), 108-117. https://doi.org/10.31470/2786-6246-2025-11-108-117
- 4. Kruhlov, V. (2022). Derzhavno-pryvatne partnerstvo yak instrument infrastrukturnoho vidnovlennia ukrainskykh mist. Aktualni problemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 1(60), 62-76. https://doi.org/10.26565/1684-8489-2022-1-04
- 5. Artiukh, O.V., & Bielinska, O.V. (2017). Derzhavno-pryvatne partnerstvo u sferi opodatkuvannia: krytychnyi ohliad suchasnykh pidkhodiv. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiia». Ser. «Ekonomika», 6(34), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.25264/2311-5149-2017-6(34)-83-88
- 6. Korobka, S.V. (2024). Biudzhetuvannia yak kliuchovyi aspekt kontrolinhu diialnosti pidpryiemstva. Problemy suchasnykh transformatsii. Seriia: ekonomika ta upravlinnia, (12). https://doi.org/10.54929/2786-5738-2024-12-04-02
- 7. Kramarenko, K. (2023). Metody biudzhetuvannia ta yikh mistse u systemi finansovoho zabezpechennia biudzhetnykh ustanov. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, (55). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-55-1
- 8. Svystun, L.A. (2022). Biudzhetuvannia hroshovykh koshtiv pidpryiemstva v umovakh rozhortannia kryzovykh yavyshch v ekonomitsi. Ekonomika i rehion, 3(86), 59-64. https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2022.3(86).2648
- 9. Hrynchyshyn, Ya. (2022). Vdoskonalennia protsesu biudzhetuvannia pidpryiemstv v umovakh nevyznachenosti. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, (43). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-43-6
- 10. Zhyber, T., & Rudyka, N. (2023). Modeliuvannia finansovoho zabezpechennia suspilnoho dobrobutu za priorytetamy publichnoho biudzhetuvannia. Ekonomichni horyzonty, 4(26), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.31499/2616-5236.4(26).2023.291783
- 11. Ridwan, B., Pratikso, & Mudiyono, R. (2023). Analysis of project budget plan with public private partnership through availability payment (Case study: Sumadra-Bungbulang Road, Garut Regency). Media Teknik Sipil, 21(2), 58-65. https://doi.org/10.22219/jmts.v21i2.28159
- 12. Hodge, G. A., & Greve, C. (2007). Public-private partnerships: An international performance review. Public Administration Review, 67, 545-558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00736.x
- 13. Stainback, J., & Donahue, M.B. (2005). Outside the budget box - Public/private partnership as a creative vehicle for finance and delivery of public school facilities. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol.131, (4), 292-296. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2005)131:4(292)
- 14. Zhang, W., Qiao, Y., Lakshmanan, P., Yuan, L., Liu, J., Zhong, C., & Chen, X. (2022). Combing public-private partnership and large-scale farming increased net ecosystem carbon budget and reduced carbon footprint of maize production. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, (184), Article 106411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106411
- 15. Pineda, C.R.M. (2022). Public-private partnership contracts: Limits on contributions from the state’s public budget. Revista Derecho del Estado, (53), 341-374. https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n53.12
- 16. Sharafi, A., Iranmanesh, H., Amalnick, M.S., & Abdollahzade, M. (2016). Financial management of public-private partnership projects using artificial intelligence and fuzzy model. International Journal of Energy and Statistics, Vol. 4, (2), Article 1650007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2335680416500071
- 17. Rouhani, O. M., Geddes, R. R., Do, W., Gao, H. O., & Beheshtian, A. (2018). Revenue-risk-sharing approaches for public-private partnership provision of highway facilities. Case Studies on Transport Policy, Vol. 6, (4), 439-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.04.003
- 18. Engel, E.M.R.A., Fischer, R., & Galetovic, A. (2019). Soft budgets and endogenous renegotiations in transport PPPs: An equilibrium analysis. Economics of Transportation, Vol. 17, 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2018.12.003
- 19. Pimentel Walker, A. P. (2015). The conflation of participatory budgeting and public-private partnerships in Porto Alegre, Brazil: The construction of a working-class mall for street hawkers. Economic Anthropology, Vol. 2, 165-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12023
- 20. Tulinov, A. (2025). Financial planning and budgeting in international infrastructure projects. The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations, Vol. 7(4), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajmei/Volume07Issue04-03
|
Archive