Economic Bulletin of the National Mining University

 

IssuesSectionsAuthorsKeywords

Article

Issue:2025 №3 (91)
Section:Finances, accounting and taxation
UDK:657.1:35
DOI:https://doi.org/10.33271/ebdut/91.122
Article language:Ukrainian
Pages:122-131
Title:Methodological principles for forming accounting policies of public sector entities: control and efficiency
Authors:Shynkarenko O. M., Cherkasy State Technological University,
Havrylenko V. O., Cherkasy State Technological University,
Andrusiak V. M., Uman National University
Annotation:Methods. The methodological framework of the study relies on a set of general scientific and specialized research methods. In particular, analysis and synthesis were used to examine scholarly approaches to defining the essence of accounting policy; induction and deduction – to develop generalizations and draw conclusions; comparison – to juxtapose the features of accounting policy in the public and private sectors; a systems approach – to study accounting policy as an integral component of the management of budgetary resources; as well as generalization and abstraction – to identify promising directions for further development. Generalization and induction underpinned the conclusions and practical recommendations. Results. The study systematizes the regulatory and methodological foundations for forming the accounting policy of public-sector entities and outlines its dual purpose: ensuring public accountability and supporting managerial decision-making. Differences in approaches to shaping accounting policy in the private and public sectors are identified. The features of object-by-object presentation of accounting policy elements for public-sector entities are examined. The analysis also reveals fragmented methodologies and inconsistent practices across principal spending units, as well as limited digital integration of accounting processes. Novelty. The paper advances a conceptual interpretation of public-sector accounting policy as a strategic management instrument that combines regulating and organizational functions and focuses on decisions that materially affect financial reporting. An integrated approach to object-byobject presentation is developed with clear criteria for selection and disclosure. A three-vector model of modernization is substantiated – normative, organizational-methodological, and innovationtechnological. Practical value. The results can be used to design and update orders on accounting policy within systems of principal spending units and subordinate institutions, to unify decisions, and to reduce the risk of reporting errors. The proposed steps toward digital integration enhance transparency, comparability, and traceability while lowering administrative costs. The materials may be applied in professional development programs for public-sector accountants and in preparing methodological guidelines for gradual harmonization with IPSAS. 
Keywords:Accounting policy, Public sector, Accounting, IPSAS, Financial reporting, Budgetary institutions, Standard harmonization, Transparency, Accountability
File of the article:EV20253_122-131.pdf
Literature:
  • 1. Shmyhel, O. (2021). Osoblyvosti formuvannia oblikovoi polityky pidpryiemstva v konkurentnomu seredovyshchi. Ekonomika ta derzhava, 1(1-2), 66-73. http://ed.pdatu.edu.ua/article/view/239757
  • 2. Kushnir, L.A., Korkushko, O.N., & Kushnir, V.O. (2020). Vplyv oblikovoi polityky na orhanizatsiiu obliku hospodariuiuchoho subiekta. Pryazovskyi ekonomichnyi visnyk, 3(20), 246-251. https://doi.org/10.32840/2522-4263/2020-3-42
  • 3. Lepetan, I.M., & Hrishyna, I.O. (2019). Oblikova polityka yak odyn z instrumentiv optymizatsii upravlinskoho obliku na pidpryiemstvi. Molodyi vchenyi, 11(75), 139-141. https://doi.org/10.32839/2304-5809/2019-11-75-31
  • 4. Tkachenko, O., & Yanko, O. (2023). Sutnist oblikovoi polityky pidpryiemstva za umovy harmonizatsii systemy bukhhalterskoho obliku ta zvitnosti. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-57-134
  • 5. Otkalenko, O.M. (2019). Osnovni aspekty oblikovoi polityky sub’iektiv derzhavnoho sektoru. Infrastruktura rynku, 33, 347-353. https://doi.org/10.32843/infrastruct33-51
  • 6. Lutsyk, Yu.O. (2019). Oblikova polityka sub’iekta derzhavnoho sektoru na suchasnomu etapi modernizatsii systemy bukhhalterskoho obliku. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 1(28), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v1i28.163920
  • 7. Kramarenko, K.M. (2021). Rol oblikovoi polityky u zabezpechenni efektyvnoi diialnosti biudzhetnykh ustanov. Efektyvna ekonomika, 10. https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2021.10.78
  • 8. Shatskova, L.P., & Fraiman, A.V. (2020). Osoblyvosti ta problemni aspekty formuvannia oblikovoi polityky biudzhetnoi ustanovy. Ekonomika: realii chasu. Naukovyi zhurnal, (2(48)), 92-100. https://doi.org/10.15276/ETR.02.2020.12
  • 9. Semenova, S., & Vicen, V. (2023). Accounting providing financial and non-financial reporting of enterprises. European Science, 2(7), 30-39. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13255264
  • 10. Antwi, S., Ocansey, E. O. N. D., & Oppong, D. (2025). International analysis of public sector accounting and fiscal governance: A systematic literature review. Open Access Library Journal, 12, e13859. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1113859
  • 11. Tsianaka, E., & Stavropoulos, A. (2023). International accounting standards in the public sector: A comparative study of Greece and European countries. Theoretical Economics Letters, 13, 808-843. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2023.134047
  • 12. Ocansey, E. O. N. D., Oppong, D., & Antwi, S. (2025). The influence of globalization on public sector accounting practices in developing countries: A systematic review. African Journal of Accounting and Financial Research, 8(3), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.52589/AJAFR-AQLWBERP
  • 13. Sonjaya, Y. (2024). Evolving perspectives on public sector accounting practices. Advances in Applied Accounting Research, 2(2), 110-122. https://doi.org/10.60079/aaar.v2i2.175
  • 14. Zakon Ukrainy «Pro bukhhalterskyi oblik ta finansovu zvitnist v Ukraini» № 996-XIV vid 16.07.1999 (zi zminamy). Natsionalne polozhennia (standart) bukhhalterskoho obliku v derzhavnomu sektori. Kyiv: Ministerstvo finansiv Ukrainy, 2010. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/996-14#Text
  • 15. NP(S)BODS 101. Podannia finansovoi zvitnosti: Natsionalne polozhennia (standart) bukhhalterskoho obliku v derzhavnomu sektori. Kyiv: Ministerstvo fi-nansiv Ukrainy, 2010. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0103-10#Text
  • 16. NP(S)BODS 125. Zminy oblikovykh otsinok ta vypravlennia pomylok: Natsionalne polozhennia (standart) bukhhalterskoho obliku v derzhavnomu sektori. Kyiv : Ministerstvo finansiv Ukrainy, 2010. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0090-11#Text
  • 17. Metodychni rekomendatsii shchodo oblikovoi polityky sub’ekta derzhavnoho sektoru: zatv. nakazom Ministerstva finansiv Ukrainy vid 23 sichnia 2015 r. № 11 Metodychni rekomendatsii shchodo oblikovoi polityky subiekta derzhavnoho sektoru : zatv. nakazom Ministerstva finansiv Ukrainy vid 23 sich. 2015 r. № 11. Kyiv: Minfin Ukrainy, 2015. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0011201-15#Text
  • 18. NP(S)BODS 121. Osnovni zasoby NP(S)BODS 121. Osnovni zasoby: Natsionalne polozhennia (standart) bukhhalterskoho obliku v derzhavnomu sektori. Kyiv: Ministerstvo finansiv Ukrainy, 2010. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1017-10#Text
  • 19. NP(S)BODS 129. Investytsiina nerukhomist: Natsionalne polozhennia (standart) bukhhalterskoho obliku v derzhavnomu sektori. Kyiv: Ministerstvo finansiv Ukrainy, 2010. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0094-11#Text
  • 20. Zapasy NP(S)BODS 123 Zapasy: Natsionalne polozhennia (standart) bukhhalterskoho obliku v derzhavnomu sektori. Kyiv: Ministerstvo finansiv Ukrainy, 2010. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1019-10#Text