Economic Bulletin of the National Mining University

 

IssuesSectionsAuthorsKeywords

Article

Issue:2021 №1 (73)
Section:Finances, accounting and taxation
UDK:65.012
DOI:https://doi.org/10.33271/ebdut/73.158
Article language:Ukrainian
Pages:158-169
Title:Expert evaluations in financial decision making
Authors:Kozenkova V. D., National Metallurgical Academy of Ukraine,
Kozenkova N. P., National Metallurgical Academy of Ukraine
Annotation:Metods. The results are obtained through the application of the following methods: analysis and synthesis – in highlighting the essence of management decisions and the information it provides; systems approach – in determining the basics of expert assessment; comparisons – to determine the advantages and disadvantages of peer review scales; abstract-logical analysis – for generalization, formulation of conclusions. Results. There are defined the tasks of choosing administrative decisions and requirements to formation of the information that provides them. Methods of evaluation and selection of alternative solutions are described. The methodology for determining generalizing indicators is considered. Methods of multicriteria optimization and selection of optimal alternatives according to several efficiency criteria are analyzed. The main stages of the procedures of expert evaluation and ranking of indicators are analyzed. The composition of the indicators used to assess the consistency of the ranking is established. The essence of the scales used in the expert evaluation is analyzed, their advantages and disadvantages are determined. It is determined that depending on the scales on which expert assessments are obtained, different weights can be assigned to the latter. It is shown, that an estimate that is provided on a scale with a large number of gradations, respectively, should have more weight, because it has greater information value than the estimates obtained on a scale with a smaller number of gradations. Novelty. The changes in the informativeness of assessments on different assessment scales are characterized. The advantages of using power scales to solve expert evaluation problems are shown, in particular for estimates that can be obtained on the basis of fuzzy-linguistic approaches and definition of membership functions, where incorrectly defined boundaries of evaluation scales can distort the final information. Practical value. It is proposed to determine the quality of expert assessments based on the assessment of their information value, in particular on the basis of calculating the amount of information in the assessment using the Hartley formula, which makes it possible to choose the assessment scale in accordance with the expert assessment. 
Keywords:Estimation, Expert estimation, Methods of multicriteria optimization, Scales of expert estimation, Weight of estimation, Estimation of information value, Hartley coefficient
File of the article:EV20211_158-169.pdf
Literature:
  • 1. Kini, R., & Rajfa, X. (1981). Prinyatie resheniy pri mnogikh kriteriyakh: Predpochteniya i zameshcheniya. Moskva: Radio i svyaz.
  • 2. Belyaev, L.S. (1978). Reshenie slozhnykh optimizatsionnykh zadach v usloviyakh neopredelennosti. Novosibirsk: Nauka.
  • 3. Nogin, V.D. (2020). Mnozhestvo i printsip Pareto. Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatelsko-poligraficheskaya assotsiatsiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy.
  • 4. Morgenshtern, O., & fon Neyman, Dzh. (2012). Teoriya igr i ekonomicheskoe povedenie. Moskva. : Kniga po Trebovaniyu.
  • 5. Fishbern, P.S. (1977). Teoriya poleznosti dlya prinyatiya resheniy. Moskva: Nauka.
  • 6. Bonciocat, A.I., Bonciocat, N.C., & Cipu, M. (2014). Irreducibility criteria for compositions and multiplicative convolutions of polynomials with integer coefficients. Versita, Vol. 22(1), 73-84. doi.org/10.2478/auom-2014-0007
  • 7. Yager, R.A. (1982). Measuring Tranquility and Anxiety in Decision-Making: an Application of Fuzzy Sets. International Journal of General Systems, Vol. 8, (3), 139-146/ doi.org/10.1080/03081078208547443
  • 8. Saati, T. (1993). Prinyatie resheniy. Metod analiza ierarhiy. Moskva: Radio i svyaz.
  • 9. Borisov, A.N., & Levchenko, A.S. (1982). Metody interaktivnoy otsenki resheniy. Riga: Zinatne.
  • 10. Bellman, R., & Zade, L. (1976). Prinyatie resheniy v rasplyvchatykh usloviyakh. Voprosy analiza i protsedury prinyatiya resheniy. Moskva: Mir.
  • 11. Podinovskiy, V.V., & Nogin, V.D. (1982). Pareto-optimalnye resheniya mnogokriterialnykh zadach. Moskva: Nauka.
  • 12 Chernov, G., & Mozes, L. (1962). Elementarnaya teoriya statisticheskikh resheniy. Moskva: Sov. radio.
  • 13. Artobolevskiy, I.I. (1979). Mekhanizmy v sovremennoy tekhnike. Moskva: Nauka. T. 1.
  • 14. Rua, B. (1976). Klassifikatsiya i vybor pri nalichii neskolkikh kriteriev (metod ELEKTRA). Voprosy analiza i procedury prinyatiya resheniy. Moskva: Mir.
  • 15. Petrovskiy, A.B. (2009). Teoriya prinyatiya resheniy. Moskva: Izdatelskiy tsentr «Akademiya».
  • 16. Podinovskiy, V.V. (2007). Vvedenie v teoriyu vazhnosti kriteriev v mnogokriterialnykh zadachakh prinyatiya resheniy. Moskva: Fizmatlit.
  • 17. Gusev, V.B., & Paveliev, V.V. (2013). Ispolzovanie nepreryvnykh shkal pri otsenivanii i prinyatii resheniy v slozhnykh problemnykh situatsiyakh. Moskva: IPU RAN.
  • 18. Grabovetskyy, B.Ye. (2010). Metody ekspertnykh otsіnok: teorіia, metodolohіia, napryamky vykorystannia. Vіnnytsia: VNTU.
  • 19. Litvak, B.G. (1982). Ekspertnaya informatsiya: Metody polucheniya i analiza. Moskva: Radio i svyaz.
  • 20. Pankova, L.A., Petrovskiy A.M., & Shneyderman, M.V. (1984). Organizatsiya ekspertiz i analiz ekspertnoy informatsii. Moskva: Nauka.
  • 21. Jouini, M.N., & Clemen, R.T. (1996). Copula Models for Aggregation Expert Opinions/ M.N. Jouini, R.T Clemen // Operations Research. - 1996. - Vol. 44. - Iss. 3. - P. 444-457. doi.org/10.1287/opre.44.3.444
  • 22. Kendall, M.Dzh., & Styuart, A. (1976). Mnogomernyy statisticheskiy analiz i vremennye ryady. Moskva: Nauka.
  • 23. Orlov, A.I. (2002). Ekonometrika. Moskva: Ekzamen.
  • 24. Tsyhanok, V.V. (2011). Vybіr shkaly otsіnyuvannia ekspertom u protsesі vykonannia nym parnykh porіvnian v systemakh pіdtrymky priyniattia rіshen. Reiestratsiia, zberіhannia і obrobka danykh, T.13, (3), 92-105.
  • 25. Lootsma, F.A. (1989). Conflict resolution via pairwise comparisons of concessions. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 40, pp.109-116. doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(89)90278-6
  • 26. Ma D., & Zheng, X. (1991). 9/9-9/1 Scale Method of AHP. Proceedings from the second International Symposium on the AHP. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, Vol. 1, pp.197-202. doi.org/10.13033/isahp.y1991.001
  • 27. Dodd, F.J., Donegan H.A., & McMaster, T.B.M. (1995). Scale Horizons in Analytic Hierarchies. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal, (4), pp. 177-188. doi.org/10.1002/mcda.4020040304
  • 28. Hartley, R.V.L. (1928). Transmission of information/ R.V.L.Hartley // Bell System Technical Journal, (7). pp. 535-563. doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1928.tb01236.x
nike lunar forever 2 mens cheap shoes sale store
  • Economic theory (current issues of modern economic theory, economic history and history of economic thought);
  • International economic relations (theory and practice of international economic relations, globalization problems, specifics of socioeconomic and sustainable development of the countries of the world)
  • Entrepreneurship and economics of enterprise (theoretical and practical issues of development of branches of national economy)
  • Finances (laws and mechanisms of financial market operation, financial support of enterprises)
  • Accounting and audit (research of methodology, methods and organization of accounting, analysis, audit and audit of financial and economic activities of enterprises and the tax system)
  • Environmental management (issues of raising utilization efficiency of environmental management, resources saving issues, problems of search and feasibility study of raw material sources, directions and efficiency of the state economic policy in resource saving and environmental protection)
  • Management (theoretical and practical issues of management in economic activities)
  • Econometrics in management decision making (scientific substantiation of efficient management decision making methods in branch and enterprise economy)
  • Мarketing (theoretical and practical issues of marketing approach to branch and enterprise development)
  • Public administration (the study of state system of economy regulation, functions, management structures of different levels, the issues of organizational and economic mechanism of state support of entrepreneurship, activation of local communities’ activities)
NIKE AIR HUARACHE

Please, note the following instructions to submit your full papers to the journal: the journal will consider previously unpublished papers in Ukrainian or English languages that should relate to the theoretical and practical profile and follow the guidelines:

1. The paper limit is 8–12 pages (single-spaced type), to be submitted electronically via e-mail.

2. For authors with no Dr. Sc. degree in Economics the paper will be submitted with a review by a Dr. Sc. in Economics to justify its novelty and practical value.

3. Each paper must accompany a completed corresponding author form which includes author’s Surname, Name and Patronymic, scientific degree, academic title, work place, position, business and home postal addresses, phone and fax number, e-mail address. Also include the office of Nova Poshta, for the copy of the Bulletin issue with the author’s publication to be sent to.

4. In case the author (authors) wish to get additional copies of the issue, this should be noted separately in the author form.

Article layout

The article starts with UDC index (left aligned, no indentation)

Next line (no line skip) is the title of the article (in capital letters, full page format).

After a line skip are the author’s initials and surname, scientific degree, academic title, place of work or study, address (comma separated). Full page format.

After a line skip is the abstract (1800 characters) in the language of the article. Abstract contains information about specific scientific results obtained in the course of the study, the level of their novelty, propositions concerning their solutions and practical value of the obtained results. In the next line (no indentation) are keywords (10-12 words) in full page format.

After a line skip is the main text (two columns format) which includes the following parts:

problem statement in general and its correlation with important scientific or practical tasks;

analysis of recent papers containing the solution of the above problem for the authors to ground their research (references are required), determination of previously unsolved parts of a general problem discussed in the article;

aim of the article (statement of purpose);

materials and methods of the research with full justification of the received scientific results;

conclusions of the research and perspectives for further scientific development in the sphere.

After a line skip is References (two column format). Bibliographic description is done according to GOST DSTU 7.1:2006 “The system of standards on information, library and publishing service. Bibliographic entry. Bibliographic description. General requirements and rules of composition” (State Commission for Academic Degrees and Titles of Ukraine Bulletin, #3, 2008).

After a line skip are abstracts (1800 characters each) in English languages with keywords in the appropriate language (6-10 words), full page format. Abstracts start with the title of the article (full page format, capitalized), author’s initials and surname, scientific degree, academic title, place of work or study in italics, full page format.

Guidelines:

  • title: Times New Roman – 12 pt, bold, capitalized;
  • subheading: Times New Roman – 12 pt, bold;
  • author’s initials and surname, degree, title, place of work or study, E-mail – 12 pt, italics;
  • main text, UDC – 12 pt;
  • abstracts, keywords – 12 pt;
  • references – 10 pt.

2.5 сm upper and lower margin, 2.0 сm left and right margin, two column format for the main text and references, 0.7 cm between columns. Paragraph indentation – 1.0 cm, single spacing.

Style and format

Formulas are printed in Equation Editor (MathType v. 4–5). Figures in the paper must be included as Microsoft Word object, grouped in a separate window created as “text box” or “Word picture”. Figures must be gray shade or pattern fill. Graphs are accepted in Microsoft Excel or standard graphics editors (Corel Draw, Adobe Illustrator) inserted in the text as objects. If graphic editors are used, the figure can be submitted as separate files linked to the text. Raster graphic objects must be submitted in uncompressed TIFF format with resolution 300 dpi or higher. Images must not be compressed into JPEG or GIF format, as quality loss is inevitable. Schemes with text can be done in the above graphic editors or Microsoft Word, in the latter case every window must be done as text box connected with other boxes by lines or arrows and then grouped. Font size in figures must be 10pt or bigger. Captions should be grouped with figures, font size – 12 pt.

The Bulletin has publication fees of 900 UAH regardless of the number of pages in the article. Additionally, 100 UAH is charged for DOI prefix..

The article is reviewed within two weeks.

The journal is published on: January 30th, March 30th, June 30th, September 30th.

『アディダス』に分類された記事一覧

Address:

Department of Economic Theory and International Economic Relations, NTU "Dnipro Polytechnic", Yavornitsky Avenue, 19, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49005.

 

Telephones: +380 (56) 47-15-66, 380 (97) 115-75-45 - Senior Editor Nina Cherchenko Albertivna.

 

 E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

30 Winter Outfit Ideas to Kill It in 2020 - Fashion Inspiration and Discovery

More Articles...