| Annotation: | Methods. The methodological basis of the study includes general scientific and specific methods of understanding the processes and phenomena of digital economic transformation: statistical methods – for data processing in assessing the level of digital economic transformation; expert assessments – for determining factors influencing the digital economy; correlation analysis – in establishing the relationship between the determinants and the scale of digitalization of the economy, etc. Results. The importance of cybersecurity in the formation of the digital economy is revealed. The level of readiness of countries to protect data in cyberspace according to the Global Cybersecurity Index (GCI) and the National Cyber Security Index (NCSI) is analyzed, and the specifics of their content are revealed. The emphasis is on assessing the impact of cybersecurity on the level of development of the digital economy. The problem of volatility of the relationship between cybersecurity and the level of digital development is identified through the prism of indicators of ICT development and network readiness. It is concluded that increasing the level of cybersecurity inevitably leads to accelerated development of the digital economy and a corresponding increase in overall welfare. It is proposed to focus the state's efforts on the development and implementation of effective cybersecurity systems of public and corporate governance, research on the development of cybersecurity in legal, organizational, and technical aspects, conducting information and training campaigns to raise public awareness and skills in the field of cybersecurity. Novelty. The relationship between cyberspace security and digital development has been established. It is shown that increasing the level of cybersecurity is a necessary but insufficient condition for more active use of information and communication technologies and acceleration of the pace of development of the digital economy. Practical value. The results allow a more flexible approach to the formation of the parameters of state policy on cybersecurity. |
| Literature: | - 1. The new digital economy (2011). How it will transform business (White paper). Oxford: Oxford Economics.
- 2. UNCTAD (2017). Information Economy Report: digitalization, trade and development. Retrieved from http: Unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ier2017_en.pdf.
- 3. Mat, B., Pero, S., Wahid, R., & Sule, B. (2019). Cybersecurity and Digital Economy in Malaysia: Trusted Law for Customer and Enterprise Protection. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering. Retrieved from http: www.ijitee.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/v8i8s3/H10610688S319.pdf
- 4. Kearney, A.T. (2018). Cybersecurity in ASEAN: An Urgent Call to Action. Retrieved from http: www.atkearney.com/documents/20152/1792707/Cybersecurity+in+ASEAN%E2%-80%94An+Urgent+Call+to+Action.pdf/1e25fefa-8ecb-9f50-e262-2467ac4ea458?t=1544723905824
- 5. Baranov, O.A. (2018). Internet rechei: teoretyko-metodolohichni osnovy pravovoho rehuliuvannia. Kyiv. Proceedings from T.1: Sfery zastosuvannia, ryzyky i bariery, problemy pravovoho rehuliuvannia.
- 6. Honchar, S.F. (2019). Otsiniuvannia ryzykiv kiberbezpeky informatsiinykh system obiektiv krytychnoi infrastruktury. Kyiv.
- 7. Hranovskyi, M.V. (2019). Derzhavna polityka u sferi zapobihannia ta protydii kibernetychnym zahrozam - dosvid Respubliky Polshcha. Teoriia ta praktyka derzhavnoho upravlinnia, Issue 4, 212-220.
- 8. Hrabar, I.H., Hryshchuk, R.V., & Molodetska, K.V. (2019). Bezpekova synerhetyka: kibernetychnyi ta informatsiinyi aspekty. Zhytomyr.
- 9. Dudykevych, V.B., Mykytyn, H.V., & Rebets, A.I. (2018). Kvintesentsiia informatsiinoi bezpeky kiberfizychnoi systemy. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Informatsiini systemy ta merezhi, (887), 58-68.
- 10. Tkachenko, O., & Tkachenko, K. (2018). Kiberprostir i kiberbezpeka: problemy, perspektyvy, tekhnolohii. Tsyfrova platforma: informatsiini tekhnolohii v sotsiokulturnii sferi, Issue 1. 75-86.
- 11. Iakoviv, I. (2017). Informatsiino-telekomunikatsiina systema, kontseptualna model kiberprostoru i kiberbezpeka. Information Technology and Security, Issue 5, (2), 134-144.
- 12. ITU. Global Cybersecurity Index (GCI), 2018. Retrieved from www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Cybersecurity/Documents/draft-18-00706_GlobalCybersecurity-Index-EV5_print_2.pdf
- 13. Machuha, R.I., & Borukh, O.S. (2016). Suchasnyi stan rynku informatsiino-komunikatsiinykh tekhnolohii Ukrainy. Skhidna Yevropa: ekonomika, biznes ta upravlinnia, (3), 260-264.
- 14. Sehyda, H. (2020). Pochemu biznes dolzhen seriyozno vosprynimat kiberuhrozy vo vremya pandemii i udalenki. Ynternet-portal «Delo.ua». Retrieved from https://delo.ua/opinions/pochemu-biznes-dolzhen-serezno-vosprinimat-kiber-372407/
- 15. Kiberbezopasnost: bolshe chem zashchita? Mezhdunarodnoe issledovanie EY v oblasti informatsionnoy bezopasnosti, 2018-2019 god?. Ernst & Young, 2018. Retrieved from https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/ey-global-information-security-survey-rus/$FILE/ey-global-information-security-survey-rus.pdf
- 16. Monin, D. (2020). Ryzyky y vyklyky novoho chasu. Dzerkalo tyzhnia. Retrieved from https://zn.ua/ukr/macrolevel/riziki-j-vikliki-novoho-chasu.html.
|
Archive