Economic Bulletin of the National Mining University

 

IssuesSectionsAuthorsKeywords

Article

Issue:2022 №4 (80)
Section:Entepreneurship and economics of enterprise
UDK:658.012.32
DOI:https://doi.org/10.33271/ebdut/80.115
Article language:Ukrainian
Pages:115-122
Title:Strategies for socially responsible interaction of business with stakeholders
Authors:Bieloborodova M. V., Dnipro University of Technology,
Khadzhynova O. V., SHEI «Priazovsky State Technical University»,
Belopolskyi M. H., SHEI «Priazovsky State Technical University»
Annotation:Methods. The following general scientific and specific methods were used for the research: theoretical generalization – when exploring an international and regional experience of small and medium-sized businesses social responsibility, method of general and specific – when summarizing existing approaches to the classification and management of stakeholders, system approach – to justify the strategies of business interaction with stakeholders based on the imbalance ratio. Results. A socially responsible business can effectively build and implement a strategy of interaction with a certain group of stakeholders only if it achieves a realistically possible balance between its diverse expectations. It is necessary to understand which groups of stakeholders, with all their expectations from the resource exchange with business, make the greatest contribution to the existing imbalance of relations. The result of solving this task will be two vectors: ideal resource exchange and real resource exchange. The difference in the structures of these vectors will indicate the imbalance of the existing resource exchange in the system of business interaction with its interested parties. Novelty. It has been proven that small businesses have an increased need for strong personal relationships with local communities and authorities. The formula for the imbalance ratio, which indicates the imbalance of the resource exchange of a fixed group of stakeholders with business is proposed. The smaller the value of this ratio in the group, the more balanced its resource exchange, and vice versa. Interaction will be effective for both parties if neither of them wants to change anything in the existing relations. Such relations can be called balanced. Accordingly, depending on the value of the imbalance ratio, four types of business interaction strategies with stakeholder groups can be distinguished, namely: influence strategy, request satisfaction strategy, protection strategy, cooperation strategy. Practical value. It is necessary for companies to determine the importance of stakeholders according to their resource contribution to the relationship with business. Strategic planning of interaction with groups of stakeholders based on optimization of the imbalance ratio enables regional small and medium-sized business to achieve socio-economic results in the most optimal way. 
Keywords:Interested parties, Stakeholders, Stakeholder management, Matrix, Resource exchange, Strategy, Corporate social responsibility, Small and medium business, Imbalance ratio, Stakeholder expectations
File of the article:EV20224_115-122.pdf
Literature:
  • 1. Mendelow, A. (1982). Environmental Scanning: The Impact of the Stakeholder Concept, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Systems, Cambridge, MA.
  • 2. Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., & Wood, D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts, The Academy of Management Review, vol. 22, (4), 853-886. doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
  • 3. Carroll, A.B., & Buchholtz, A.K. (2014) Business and society: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management. Nelson Education.
  • 4. Fletcher, A., Guthrie, J., Steane, P., Roos, G., and Pike, S. (2003). Mapping stakeholder perceptions for a third sector organization, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(4), 505-527. doi.org/10.1108/14691930310504536
  • 5. Ackermann, F., & Eden, C. (2011). Strategic management of stakeholders: Theory and practice. Long range planning, 44(3), 179-196. doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.08.001
  • 6. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications, Academy of Management Review, 1, 65-66. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887
  • 7. Farooq, O., Rupp, D.E., & Farooq, M. (2017). The multiples pathways through which internal and external corporate social responsibility influence organizational identification and multifoci outcomes: The moderating role of cultural and social orientations, Academy of Management Review, Issue 60, 954-985. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0849
  • 8. Rodriguez-Gomez, S., Arco-Castro, M.L., Lopez-Perez, M.V., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2020). Where does CSR come from and where does it go? A review of the state of the art. Adm. Sci., Issue 10, 60 https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030060.60
  • 9. Taraniuk, L., Melnyk, L., Kozmenko, O., & Sineviciene, L. (2017). Influence of the minimum salary level increase on the business entities activity in the context of the transition to the sustainable development. Problems and perspectives in management, 15(1), 72-79.
  • 10. Aguinis, H., Villamor, I., & Gabriel, K.P. (2020). Understanding employee responses to COVID-19: A behavioral corporate social responsibility perspective, Management Resources, Issue 18, 421-438.
  • 11. Stoyko, I., Sherstiuk, R., & Dolubovska, O. (2022). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist biznesu v Ukraini u voiennyy i pisliavoiennyy period. Sotsialno-ekonomichni problemy iI derzava, Issue 2(27), 93-106. Retrieved from http://sepd.tntu.edu.ua/images/stories/pdf/2022/22siiipp.pdf doi.org/10.33108/sepd2022.nom2.093
  • 12. Zvarych, R., Homotyuk, V., Rivilis, I., & Deyneka, Y. (2022). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist biznesu yak instrument mizhnarodnoho korporatyvnoho menedzhmentu v umovakh kryzy. Visnyk Ekonomiky, Issue 2, 142-156. https://doi.org/10.35774/visnyk2022.02.142
  • 13. Kuvayeva, T., Pilova, K., & Maherramova, I. (2021). Etyka marketynhu ta sotsialna vidpovidalnist yak osnova pobudovy kliyentooriyentovanoyi stratehiyi pidpryiemstva. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, Issue 29. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-29-13
  • 14. Nahornova, O.V. (2018). Korporatyvna sotsialʹna vidpovidalʹnistʹ v upravlinni trudovymy resursamy. Visnyk Volynskoho instytutu ekonomiky ta menedzhmentu, Issue 20, 207-214.
  • 15. Husieva, O.Yu., Voskoboieva, O.V., & Khlevytska, T.B. (2020). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist biznesu. Kyiv: Derzhavnyy universytet telekomunikatsiy.
  • 16. The Institute of Social and Ethical Accountability (2018). AA1000 Accountability Principles (AA1000AP). Accountability 2020. Retrieved from http://www.accountability.org/standards
  • 17. DniproODA (2021). Perelik rehionalnykh tsilʹovykh prohram. Retrieved from https://adm.dp.gov.ua/storage/app/media/uploaded-files/perelik_RP_stanom_na_2602_2021.pdf