| Annotation: | Methods. The research is based on the use of such methods as: abstraction – when establishing the essence of the category of «structural capital», logical and historical – when researching the origins of theories of technological determinism, grouping – when classifying theories of technological determinism and components of structural capital, structural-functional – when determining the influence of each of the components of structural capital on the technical and technological development of society. Results. The work defines the methodological origins of the theories of technological determinism and evolutionary concepts of technological changes. Within the theories of technological determinism, two groups of conceptual approaches to the study of technical and technological development are distinguished, namely: theories of economic futurology and transformation of the economy. The second group of theories is recognized as the most constructive in the study of the factors of technical and technological development, since it is in them that changes in structural and organizational and legal factors are considered. Different essential content of the «structural capital» category has been demonstrated. It is proposed to consider the components of structural capital in view of its material and immaterial characteristics. Material assets include the results of human activity that can be codified, documented and legally protected. Intangible assets include elements that reflect the intangible side of production processes and combine all those elements that cannot be codified, documented and legally protected. Novelty. Taking into account the nature of changes caused by the action of technical and technological factors, the theory of technological determinism is divided into the concept of economic futurology and the theory of transformation of the economy. The use of the methodological potential of the latter made it possible to distinguish material and immaterial components of structural capital and establish the role of organizational factors in the technical and technological development of society. Practical value. Improved methodological approaches to the classification of theories of technological determinism and the grouping of elements of structural capital allow to more accurately identify the factors influencing technical and technological development and predict the consequences for the functioning of the economic system of society. |
| Literature: | - 1. Castells, M. (1999). Information Technology, Globalization and Social Development. UNRISD Discussion. Paper № 114. P. 15.
- 2. Pylypenko, H.M., & Chornobaiev, V.V. (2005). Mekhanizm initsiiuvannia innovatsiynoho rozvytku v Ukraini. Ekonomichnyi visnyk NHU, (4), 7-12.
- 3. Pylypenko, H.M., & Chornobaiev, V.V. (2010). Innovatsiyno-investytsiyna diialnist ta yiyi rehuliuvannia v ekonomitsi Ukrainy. Dnipropetrovsk: Natsionalnyi hirnychyi universytet.
- 4. Boschma R. (2005). Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment, Regional Studies, 39:1, 61-74. DOI: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
- 5. Veblen, T. The theory of business enterprise. New York: Charless Scribners Sons 1915. 408 p.
- 6. Stewart, T. (2001). The wealth of knowledge: Intellectual capital and the twenty-first-century organizations. N. Y. : Doubleday Business. 400 p.
- 7. Edvinsson L., Malone M. (1997). Intellectual capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower. New York, N. Y. : Harper Collins Publishers. 240 p.
- 8. Bozbura F., Beskese A. (2007). Prioritization of organizational capital easurement indicators using fuzzy AHP. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 44 (2). Pp. 124-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2006.07.005
- 9. Sullivan, P. (1998). Profiting from Intellectual Capital Extracting Value from Innovation. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.. 384 p.
- 10. Brooking A. (1996). Intellectual capital. Core asset for the third millennium enterprise. - London: International thomson business press, 1996. 204 p.
- 11. Sveiby, K. (1997). The Intangible Assets Monitor. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting . 2 (1). Pp. 73-97. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb029036
- 12. Saint-Onge. (1996). Tacit knowledge: the key to the strategic alignment of intellectual capital. Strategy and Leadership, 24 ( 2 ). Pp. 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb054547
- 13. Brooking, A. (1996). Intellectual capital. Core asset for the third millennium enterprise. London: International thomson business press. 204 p.
- 14. Sveiby, K. (1997). The Intangible Assets Monitor. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting. 2 (1). Pp.73-97. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb029036
- 15. Petrash, G. (1996). Dow’s journey to a knowledge value management culture. European Management Journal. 14 (4). Pp. 365-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-2373(96)00023-0
- 16. Fedulova, I.V. (2010). Intelektualnyi kapital yak transformovanyi resurs innovatsyinoho potentsialu. Naukovi pratsi ONAKhT, (38), T. 1, 425-430.
- 17. Yereshko, Yu. (2021). Ekonomichnyi zmist i struktura intelektualnoho kapitalu yak faktoru vyrobnytstva. Ekonomichnyi analiz, T. 31, (1), 105-113. https://doi.org/10.35774/econa2021.01.0105
- 18. Wójcik M. (2021). Structural capital and its importance for the intellectual capital of an organization.. Retrieved from https://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/artykul/index/numer/92/id/1543
|
Archive