| Annotation: | Methods. In the process of researching the role of the process approach in the management of digital changes at enterprises in the conditions of the circular economy, methods of analysis and synthesis, empirical methods, induction and deduction techniques, graphic and logical methods were used. The methodological basis of the research is the method of compositional analysis, the results of which make it possible to compositionally and spatially outline the role of the process approach in the management of digital changes at enterprises in the conditions of the circular economy - for the formation of a hierarchical-compositional model of the system order of the implementation of the process approach in the management of digital changes at enterprises in the conditions of a circular economy economy. Results. The article improves the hierarchical-composite model of the implementation of the process approach in the management of digital changes at enterprises in the conditions of the circular economy, which is based on the systematic implementation and parameterization of effective management-spectral processes that comprehensively reflect the variability of economic interests and their balance in the model in the presence of potentially high-quality management solutions and consolidation of the integrated use of digital technologies, strategic vision, technological and financial flexibility and managerial response to changes in the digital industry in the era of the circular economy, which will ensure the consistency of information and digital technologies and the structural hierarchy of business processes, system compatibility and integration, effective exchange of process – digital data for making balanced management decisions. Novelty consists in the improvement of the hierarchical-compositional model of the implementation of the process approach in the management of digital changes at enterprises. Practical value. The hierarchical-composite model of the introduction of a process approach in the management of digital changes at enterprises in the conditions of a circular economy allows for the formation of a system-process and hierarchical parameterization of the activity of industrial enterprises at all financial and economic levels, taking into account the nature of interdependent influences and establishing a process-causal alignment for the most important security parameters of enterprises for of each trajectory of their strategic development. |
| Literature: | - 1. Bagstad, K.J., & Shammin, M.R. (2012). Can the Genuine Progress Indicator better inform sustainable regional progress? - A case study for Northeast Ohio. Ecological Indicators, 18, 330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.11.026
- 2. Bezuhla, J., Kononenko, Ya, Bytiak, O., Zaitseva, A., Zacharchyn, H., & Korin, M. (2021). Renovation and sustainable development of the industrial energy enterprise: economic and legal management mechanism. Proceedings from IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. MIIM ’21: 8th International Scientific Conference on Sustainability in Energy and Environmental Science. (21-22 October 2020). Vol. 628, Issue. 1, 8 P. 012009. Ivano-Frankivsk. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/628/1/012009
- 3. Bezuhla, J.E. (2015). Scenarios of enterprises economic activity development. Actual Problems of Economics, 170(8), 402-408.
- 4. Danilishin, B., & Veklich, O. (2010). Genuine progress indicator as an adequate macroeconomic indicator of public welfare. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 21, 644.
- 5. Desruelle, P., & Nepelski, D. (2017). The «Innovation Radar»: A New Policy Tool to Support Innovation Management. Proceedings from MIIM ’17 45th Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy (TPRC 45) (September 08.09, 2017) Arlington. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2944104.
- 6. Forsman, H. Innovation capacity and in novation development in small enterprises. A com parison between the manufacturing and service sectors. Research Policy. 2011. Vol. 40, Issue 5. P. 739-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.003
- 7. Hassan, Ali Al-Ababneh and Salem, A.S. Alrhaimi. (2020). Modern Approaches to Education Management to Ensure the Quality of Educational Services. Retrieved from https://www.temjournal.com/content/92/TEMJournalMay2020_770_778.pdf
- 8. Horng, J.S., Chou, S.F., Liu, C.H.,& Tsai, C.Y. (2013). Creativity, aesthetics and eco friendliness: A physical dining environment design synthetic assessment model of innovative resta urants. Tourism Management, Issue 36, 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.11.002
- 9. Khabibullin, R.I. (2018). Modern trends in the development of cooperation (Science and education issues), 14(26), 5.
- 10. Khabibullin, RI., Kleiner, G.B., & Dementyev V.E. (2017). Collective forms of management in the modern economy.
- 11. Lawn Philip (2013). The failure of the ISEW and GPI to fully account for changes in human- health capital - A methodological shortcoming not a theoretical weakness. Ecological Economics, Elsevier. (88), 167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.028
- 12. Prokhorova, V., Protsenko, V., Bezuglaya, Y., & Us, J. (2018). The optimization algorithm for the directions of influence of risk factors on the system that manages the potential of machinebuilding enterprises /Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(1-94), 6-13
- 13. Pylypenko, H.M. (2013). Cultural impact on the ratio of public and market coordination in Ukraine. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoh Univesytetu, (3), 118.
|
Archive