| Annotation: | Methods. The results of the scientific study presented in this article were obtained using the following research methods: theoretical generalization was used to study the interaction between scientific and educational institutions which produce «academic» research developments, and businesses within the technology transfer management system; systematization was applied to identify the advantages of academic technology transfer; quantitative analysis methods (statistical, econometric) was used to assess the effectiveness of knowledge transfer, identify trends in key indicators, and analyze their interrelationships; critical analysis and synthesis was used to identify the reasons for the low level of interaction between representatives of science and business. Results. The article demonstrates the importance of technology transfer as a connecting link between the scientific and educational institutions and business. The advantages of academic technology transfer are identified from the perspective of businesses, universities as producers of scientific developments, students, the country, and society. Approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of knowledge transfer are characterized, and trends and interrelationships of key indicators of such transfer are determined based on statistical data from the United States. The peculiarities of trend formation considering the specifics of the scientific research and commercialization of their results are determined. The main reasons for the low level of interaction between representatives of science and business in the technology transfer management system are identified and characterized. Novelty. The reasons for the low level of interaction between representatives of science and business have been determined based on the identified patterns of change and interrelationships of key indicators of knowledge transfer effectiveness, as well as the revealed benefits for its participants. Practical value. The scientific results can be useful for all participants in knowledge transfer, particularly for the state in shaping policies to support universities as centers of scientific development generation, for universities in improving the effectiveness of knowledge transfer offices, and for business seeking to develop in line with global trends. |
| Literature: | - 1. Understanding University Technology Transfer. (2011). Association of American Universities. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED517264.pdf.
- 2. The role of European universities in patenting and innovation. A study of academic inventions at the EPO. October 2024. Retrieved from https://surl.lu/nkewqu.
- 3. Draghi, M. (2024). The future of European competitiveness. European Commission. Retrieved from https://surl.li/tveciv.
- 4. Rybnicek, R., & Königsgruber, R. (2019). What makes industry-university collaboration succeed? A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Business Economics. Vol. 89. 221-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-018-0916-6.
- 5. Atta-Owusu, K., Fitjar, R. D., Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2021). What drives university-industry collaboration? Research excellence or firm collaboration strategy? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121084.
- 6. Farah, A., Tahir, FM., Rizwan, AS., Noor, ER. (2022). Strengthening the Bridge Between Academic and the Industry Through the Academia-Industry Collaboration Plan Design Model. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol.13. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875940.
- 7. O'dwyer, M., Filieri, R., O'Malley, L. (2023). Establishing successful university-industry collaborations: barriers and enablers deconstructed. The Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 48. 900-931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09932-2.
- 8. Sych, T.V. (2022). Rol uriadu shchodo vprovadzhennia tretoi misii v ukrainskykh universytetakh v umovakh yevrointehratsii. Publichne upravlinnia ta mytne administruvannia. Spetsvypusk, prysviachenyi yevrointehratsiinii tematytsi. 123-128. https://doi.org/10.32782/2310-9653-2022-spec.20.
- 9. Lipych, L., Khilukha, O., Kushnir, M. (2021). Lohistychna pidtrymka transferu znan zi sfery nauky do sektoru malykh ta serednikh pidpryiemstv. Pidpryiemnytstvo ta innovatsii. (18). 40-45. https://doi.org/10.37320/2415-3583/18.7.
- 10. Duma, O.I. (2021). Akademichnyi transfer tekhnolohii: mekhanizmy realizatsii ta yevropeiskyi dosvid. Efektyvna ekonomika, (11). https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2021.11.203.
- 11. McDevitt, VL., Mendez-Hinds, J., Winwood, D., Nijhawan, V., Sherer, T., Ritter, JF., & Sanberg, PR. (2014). More than Money: the Exponential Impact of Academic Technology Transfer. Technology & Innovation. Vol. 16 (1). 75-84. https://doi.org/10.3727/194982414X13971392823479.
- 12. Campbell, A., Cavalade, C., Haunold, Ch., Karanikic, P., Piccaluga, A., & Dinnetz, M. (2020). Knowledge Transfer Metrics. Towards a European-wide set of harmonised indicators. Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2760/907762.
- 13. Official site of Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM). Licensing Activity Surveys. Retrieved from https://surl.li/mxcgdf.
- 14. Ofitsiinyi sait Tsentru mizhnarodnykh proektiv «Ievroosvita». Retrieved from https://euroosvita.net/.
|
Archive