Economic Bulletin of the National Mining University

 

IssuesSectionsAuthorsKeywords

Article

Issue:2025 №3 (91)
Section:Finances, accounting and taxation
UDK:65.012.1:657.1:657.2
DOI:https://doi.org/10.33271/ebdut/91.111
Article language:Ukrainian
Pages:111-121
Title:Harmonization of customs regulation and accounting in Ukraine in accordance with international standards
Authors:Brazilii N. M., Cherkasy State Technological University,
Tkachenko A. A., Cherkasy State Technological University,
Sakhno T. A., Cherkasy State Technological University
Annotation:Methods. A combination of general scientific and specialized methods was applied. The dialectical method allowed revealing the interrelation between customs regulation and accounting. The systems approach enabled consideration of customs legislation and IFRS as interconnected elements of the regulatory system. The comparative-legal method was used to compare Ukrainian legislation with IFRS requirements and EU practices. Analysis and synthesis methods detailed problematic aspects of customs value formation. Economic and statistical methods processed data on import-export operations and customs payments. Generalization and induction formed the basis for conclusions and practical recommendations. Results. Significant discrepancies were identified between Ukrainian customs regulation and IFRS, complicating accounting and the preparation of reliable financial statements, particularly regarding customs value, income and expenses, and transfer pricing. Customs administration is oriented toward fiscal control, while IFRS emphasizes information transparency. EU experience confirmed the feasibility of digitizing procedures, integrating databases, and applying the «extended hand» principle. Legislative improvements, integration of information systems, and enhanced professional qualifications were proposed. Novelty. Key discrepancies between Ukrainian customs legislation and IFRS were systematized, concerning customs value, timing of income and expense recognition, and asset classification. An integrative approach to harmonizing accounting and customs procedures was proposed, the methodology for determining customs value was improved, and the digitalization of processes with the creation of an integrated ERP database was justified. Directions for enhancing professional capacity and adapting European and international experience into national legislation were identified. A concept was developed to reduce corruption risks and increase transparency through unified procedures. Practical value. The results can be used to improve the regulatory framework and ensure reliable financial reporting by enterprises. Recommendations on digitization and integration of information systems enhance the efficiency of customs administration, increase transparency, reduce corruption risks, and optimize business interaction with the state. Practical value also includes training specialists and developing methodological materials. 
Keywords:Customs regulation, Accounting, IFRS, Harmonization, Customs value, Financial reporting, Foreign economic activity, Digitization, EU, Transparency, Transfer pricing, Customs administration
File of the article:EV20253_111-121.pdf
Literature:
  • 1. Tkachenko, O., & Yanko, O. (2023). Sutnist oblikovoi polityky pidpryiemstva za umov harmonizatsii systemy bukhhalterskoho obliku ta zvitnosti. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-57-134
  • 2. Skybinskyi, O., & Syvokhip, P. (2024). Osoblyvosti mytnoho rehuliuvannia v Ukraini. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-62-108
  • 3. Yarmak, A.M. (2024). Porivniannia modelei bukhhalterskoho obliku Ukrainy ta YeS: problemy adaptatsii ta harmonizatsii. Ekonomichnyi visnyk NTUU «Kyivskyi politekhnichnyi instytut», (31), 18-22. https://doi.org/10.20535/2307-5651.31.2024.319013
  • 4. Atamanchuk, N.I. (2025). Harmoni- zatsiia zakonodavstva Ukrainy shchodo administruvannia mytnykh platezhiv z pravom Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho univer- sytetu. Ser. : Pravo, 2(87), 267-273. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.87.2.40
  • 5. Zasadnyi, B. (2019). Perspektyvy rozvytku natsionalnoi systemy bukhhalterskoho obliku v umovakh yevrointehratsiinykh protsesiv. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, (20). Retrieved from https://economyandsociety.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/1178 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2019-20-89
  • 6. Ozeran, A.V., & Korshykova, R.S. (2016). Harmonizatsiia vymoh P(S)BO Ukrainy iz MSFZ shchodo obliku osnovnykh zasobiv. Nezalezhnyi audytor, (15), 5461. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Na_2016_15_10
  • 7. Luchko, M., & Melnyk, N. (2019). MSFZ-zvitnist: praktychni aspekty perekhodu. Visnyk Ternopilskoho natsionalnoho ekonomichnoho universytetu, 4(94), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.35774/visnyk2019.04.042
  • 8. Harkusha, S. (2022). Rozvytok bukhhalterskoho obliku yak informatsiinoi systemy v umovakh hlobalizatsii. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, (36). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-36-29
  • 9. Nobes, C., & Parker, R. (2020). Comparative international accounting (14th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
  • 10. Auerbach, T., & Pinto, D. (2013). Customs valuation and transfer pricing: Is it possible to harmonise? World Customs Journal, 7(1), 3-15.
  • 11. Van der Tas, L. G. (1988). Measuring harmonisation of financial reporting practice. Accounting and Business Research, 18(70), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1988.9729361
  • 12. OECD. (2022). Transfer pricing guidelines for multinational enterprises and tax administrations. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/tax/transfer-pricing/oecd-transfer-pricing-guidelines.htm
  • 13. World Customs Organization (WCO). (2015). Guide to customs valuation and transfer pricing. Retrieved from https://www.wcoomd.org/en/media/newsroom/2015/july/guide-to-customs-valuation-and-transfer-pricing.aspx
  • 14. World Customs Organization (WCO). (1999). International convention on the simplification and harmonization of customs procedures (Revised Kyoto Convention). Retrieved from https://www.wcoomd.org/en/topics/facilitation/instrument-and-tools/conventions/pf_revised_kyoto_conv.aspx
  • 15. IFRS Foundation. (n.d.). List of standards. Retrieved from https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/
  • 16. Zakon Ukrainy «Pro bukhhalterskyi oblik ta finansovu zvitnist v Ukraini» № 996-XIV vid 16.07.1999 (zi zminamy). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/996-14#Text
  • 17. Mytnyi kodeks Ukrainy (chynna redaktsiia). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4495-17#Text
  • 18. Podatkovyi kodeks Ukrainy (stattia 39 - transfertne tsinoutvorennia). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2755-17#n7890
  • 19. Natsionalni polozhennia (standarty) bukhhalterskoho obliku (NP(S)BO). Ministerstvo finansiv Ukrainy. Retrieved from https://mof.gov.ua/npbo
  • 20. Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy № 86 vid 04.02.1998 «Pro zatverdzhennia Polozhennia pro dokumentalne zabezpechennia zapysiv u bukhhalterskomu obliku». Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/86-98-%D0%BF#Text
  • 21. Nakaz Ministerstva finansiv Ukrainy № 292 vid 13.06.2016 «Pro zatverdzhennia Poriadku podannia zvitu pro kontroliovani operatsii». Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0905-16#Text
Home Archive Copyright © 2025 Economic Bulletin of the National Mining University. All Rights Reserved. Designed by JoomlArt.com. Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU General Public License.