| Annotation: | The article is devoted to the identification of theoretical and methodological problems that occur while studying the harmonization of economic interests. On the basis of the analysis of the evolution of the views of scholars of the past and present on the interaction of economic interests insociety, the existence of a wide amalgam of thoughts, ideas and conceptual approaches that were introduced in this field by representatives of different directions of economic science has been established. In the course of the study, four basic logic-theoretical lines were identified, which were formed in the process of scientific search for conditions and mechanism of harmonization of economic interests. The first line is the formation of ideas about the existence of interconnection and interdependence of economic interests, which posed the problem of finding a mechanism for their coordination. The second line is the question of creating such a mechanism. In this direction, the approaches are either emphasized according to which the interests are considered to be harmonized by the action of objective economic laws and directly through the market mechanism of self-regulation, or else the impossibility of harmonization in the automatic mode is pointed out. Psychological features of people, their moral imperfection, tendency to affective and illogical actions can not be regulated by the market. In order to solve this problem, an external force is involved, which, according to various researchers, acts as a moral, state, law, socio-cultural institutions. The third line is a solution of the question about the state's ability to effectively influence the harmonization of interests. In this regard, scientists have quite different positions - from confidence in the effectiveness of state influence on the conditions of realization of economic interests to the detection of «failures» of the state. The fourth line is intuitive ideas of scholars about the reproduction of economic interests, which is manifested in the constant repetition of the situation of income and product movement, which occurs in society under the pressure of the desire for the welfare of each social class. The practical importance of the idea of existence of reproduction of economic interests is shown, which allows to establish the conditionality of realization of interests by objective social factors. |
| Literature: | - 1. Gegel, G.V.F. (1993). Lektsii po filosofii istorii. Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka.
- 2. Khirshman, A.O. (2008). Interesy. Nevidimaya ruka rynka. Dzh. Ituell, M. Migeyt, P. Niumen (Ed). Moskva: GU VShE.
- 3. Kene, F, Tyurgo, A.R.Zh., & Dyupon de Nemur, P.S. (2008). Fiziokraty. Izbrapnnye ekonomicheskie proizvedeniya. Moskva: Eksmo.
- 4. Smit, A. (2001). Doslidzhennia pro pryrodu ta prychyny dobrobutu natsiy. Kyiv: Port-Roya1.
- 5. Viner, J. (1927). Adam Smith and Laissez Faire. Journal of Political Economy, 35(2), 198-232. doi:10.1086/25383
- 6. Smit, R. (2008). Istoriya gumanitarnykh. Moskva: GU VShE.
- 7. Yadgarov, Ya.S. (2000). Istoriya ekonomicheskikh ucheniy. Moskva: INFRA-M.
- 8. Bastia, F. (2007). Ekonomucheskie gaemonii. Izbrannoe. Moskva: Eksmo.
- 9. Mill, Dzh.S. (2007). Osnovy poliricheskoy ekonomii s nekotorymi prilozheniyami k sotsialnoy filosofii. Moskva: Eksmo.
- 10. Marks, K., & Engels, F. (1968). Sochineniya. Vols. 46, part 1. Moskva: Politizdat, Institut Marksizma- Leninizma pri TsK KPSS.
- 11. Marks, K., & Engels, F. (1968). Sochineniya. Vols. 18. Moskva: Politizdat.
- 12. Rozenberg, D.I. (1984). Kommentarii k Kapitalu K. Marksa. Moskva: Ekonomika.
- 13. Marks, K., & Engels, F. (1964). Sochineniya. Vols. 26, Part 3. Moskva: Politizdat.
- 14. Marks, K., & Engels, F. (1956). Iz rannikh proizvedeniy. Moskva: Politizdat.
- 15. Olson, M. (1998). Vozvyshenie i upadok narodov. Ekonomicheskiy rost, stagflyatsiya, sotsialnyy skleroz. Novosibirsk: EKOR.
- 16. Olson, M. (2012). Vlast i protsvetanie. Pererastaya kommunisricheskie i kapitalisticheskie dik- tatury Moskva: Novoe izdatelstvo.
|
Archive