Economic Bulletin of the National Mining University

 

IssuesSectionsAuthorsKeywords

Article

Issue:2021 №4 (76)
Section:Economic theory
UDK:330.111.4:001
DOI:https://doi.org/10.33271/ebdut/76.009
Article language:Ukrainian
Pages:9-17
Title:Post-industrialism and its essential characteristics
Author:Fedorova N. E., SHEI Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology
Annotation:Methods. The results are obtained through the use of the following methods: abstraction – in determining the essence of the category «post-industrialism»; logical and historical – in the study of the evolution of theoretical concepts of post-industrialism; method of classifications – when summarizing all available definitions of this category into groups; general and special – in establishing the unity of existing definitions of post-industrialism. Results. It is established that against the background of a large number of definitions of postindustrialism there is no established understanding of it in the scientific literature. Thus, postindustrialism is interpreted by scientists as a certain type of society, its new order or system, as a certain phase of its development, its state, structure, as change or evolution, and there is an interpretation of this category as a certain theory, idea, process, etc. It has been proved that postindustrialism should be interpreted in terms of a new phase of socio-economic development of society, which consists in building a social system qualitatively different from industrialism, or a new social organization formed under the influence of the fourth information revolution. It has been found that the definition of post-industrialism can synthesize such its essential components as «stage, phase of development» and «new order, a new organization of society». The need to implement a threecomponent approach to the definition of this category is indicated. Novelty. There was provided an essential characteristic of post-industrialism as a new phase of social development, implemented as a socio-economic organization of society, where under the influence of science, knowledge, and information dominates the tertiary sector of production or services sphere. As a result, the main value of society becomes human capital (as opposed to land or production and finance) and the knowledge, information, and spirituality produced by it. Practical value. Proper categorical design of the concept of post-industrialism, i.e. defining its essence, characteristics, and forms of manifestation opens up prospects for a deeper understanding of its features as an environment where the whole complex of socio-economic relations of society at the present stage of its development. 
Keywords:Industrialism, Post-industrialism, Post-industrial society, Post-industrial economy, Socio-economic development of society
File of the article:EV20214_009-017.pdf
Literature:
  • 1. Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. - New York: BasicBooks.
  • 2. Toffler, A. (2004). Tretia volna. Moskva: AST.
  • 3. Drucker, P.F. (1995). Post-Capitalist Society. - NY. Retrieved from http://pinguet.free.fr/drucker93.pdf.
  • 4. Riesman, D. (1958). Leisure and Work in Post- Industrial Society / ed. by E. Larrabee, R. Meyersohn. - Glencoe, Ill. : Free Press.
  • 5. Touraine, A. (1969). La societe postindustrielle. - Paris: Denoel.
  • 6. Phelps, E.S. Macroeconomics for a Modern Economy: Prize Lecture. Retrieved from: https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/phelps_lect ure.pdf.
  • 7. Targ, H.R. (1976). Global Dominance and Dependence, Post-Industrialism, and International Relations Theory: A Review // International Studies Quarterly. - Vol. 20 (3). - P. 461-482.
  • 8. Heiets, V.M. (2009). Suspilstvo, derzhava, ekonomika: fenomenolohiia vzaiemodii ta rozvytku. Kyiv: NAN Ukrainy; Instytut ekonomiky ta prohnozuvannia NAN Ukrainy.
  • 9. Filipenko, A.S. (2007). Hlobalni formy ekono- michnoho rozvytku: istoriia i suchasnist. Kyiv: Znannia.
  • 10. Chukhno, A.A. (2006). (Vols. 1-3). T.2: Informatsiina postindustrialna ekonomika: teoriia i praktyka. Kyiv: NAN Ukrainy, Kyivskyy natsionalnyy universytet imeni T. Shevchenka, Naukovo-doslidnyy finansovyy instytutt pry Minfini Ukrainy.
  • 11. Inozemcev, V.L. (2000). Sovremennoe postin- dustrialnoe obshchestvo: priroda, protivorechiya, perspektivy. Moskva: Logos. Retrieved from http://filosof.historic.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000946/st003.shtml.
  • 12. Yakovets, Yu.V. (2003). Globalizatsiya i vzaimo-deystvie tsivilizatsiy. (2nd ed.). Moskva: Ekonomika.
  • 13. Coomaraswamy, A. (1914). Essays in Post- Industrialism: A Symposium of Prophecy Concerning the future of Society / ed. by Ananda Coomaraswamy. London: T.N. Foulis.
  • 14. Penty, A. (1922). Post-Industrialism. - L. : G. Allen and Unwin.
  • 15. Bell, D. (1968). Toward the Year 2000. Work in Progress. Boston.
  • 16. Telnov, A.S., & Honcharuk, V.V. (2009). In- telektualizatsiia pratsi u kontseptsii postindustrialnoho suspilstva. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu, (1), 239- 245.
  • 17. Wilensky, H.L. (2003). Working Paper Post- industrialism and post-materialism? A critical view of the new economy, the information age, the high tech society and all that. - Berlin: Für Sozialforschung (WZB).
  • 18. Penty, A. (1917). Old Worlds for New: A Study of Post-Industrial State. - London: G. Allen&Unwin ltd.
  • 19. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar politologicheskikh terminov. (2013). Sankt-Peterburg: Petropolis. Retrieved from https://politike.ru/termin/postindustrializm.html.
  • 20. Yakunin, V.I., Sulakshin, S.S., Bagdasa- ryan, V.E., Kara-Murza, S.G., «et al.» (2012). Postindustrializm. Opyt kriticheskogo analiza. Moskva: Nauchnyy ekspert.
  • 21. Lexico: Oxford English and Spanish Dic- tionary, Synonyms, and Spanish to English Translator. Retrieved from: https://www.lexico.com/definition/post- industrialism.
  • 22. Stevens, A. The Lived Realities of Precarity and Post-Industrialism. Retrieved from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/722983.
  • 23. Weber, A. L. (1974). The politics of post- industrialisn: a comparative inquiry. Washington State University.
  • 24. Musaelyan, L.A. (2005). Nauchnaya teoriya istoricheskogo processa: stanovlenie i sushchnost. Perm: Izdatelstvo Permskogo universiteta.
  • 25. Bzhezinskiy, Z. (1972). Mezhdu dvumya ve- kami. Rol Ameriki v eru tekhnotroniki. Moskva: Progress.
  • 26. Kumar, K. Industrialism and Post- Industrialism: relections on a putative transition. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1976.tb00265.x
  • 27. Lebedko, S. (2007). Postindustrializm vzhe na porozi… Os vona nasha dylema: prokat chy suputny- ky? Personal-Plius, 40(243). Retrieved from http://www.personal-plus.net/243/2581.html/
  • 28. Lazarevich, A. (2007). Postindustrializm v zerkale teorii informatsionnogo obshchestva / Filosofiya i obshchestvo, Filosofiya i sotsialnye nauki, (4), 11-17.
  • 29. English Dictionary Collins - Complete and Unbreaficial Digital Edition. Retrieved from https://www.dictionary.com/browse/industrialism//.
  • 30. Kramar, O. (2016). Pohliad iz peryferii. Ukrainskyi tyzhden, 14(438). Retrieved from https://tyzhden.ua/Economics/162508.