Economic Bulletin of the National Mining University

 

IssuesSectionsAuthorsKeywords

Article

Issue:2022 №3 (79)
Section:Entepreneurship and economics of enterprise
UDK:338. 2
DOI:https://doi.org/10.33271/ebdut/79.170
Article language:Ukrainian
Pages:170-180
Title:On the issue of selecting the projects for sustainable development of enterprise taking into account interests of stakeholders and the way to solve it
Authors:Pashkevych M. S., Dnipro University of Technology,
Pistunov I. M., Dnipro University of Technology,
Huannan Li., Dnipro University of Technology
Annotation:Methods. The study of the problem of selecting projects for sustainable development of an enterprise, taking into account the interests of stakeholders, is based on the theoretical and methodological concepts of sustainable development, stakeholders, project management, rational and irrational behaviour of economic subjects. General scientific methods of research that were used are the method of analysis and synthesis – in the study of corporate sustainable development in the aspect of project management; general and specific – when justifying the specifics of taking into account the interests of stakeholders during the selection of sustainable development projects for an enterprise; cluster analysis – when substantiating the group interest of the company’s stakeholders; discrete analysis – when proving the discreteness property of such indicators as benefits and contributions to projects of corporate sustainable development. Results. The article researches the methodological problem of ensuring the sustainable development of enterprises in the context of the need to achieve global goals of sustainable development for the socio-economic and ecological post-war development of Ukraine and the consolidation of society around the implementation of sustainable development projects. The debatable nature of some aspects of modern mechanisms for ensuring the sustainable development of enterprises is shown. The attitude of scientists to the participation of stakeholders in ensuring the sustainable development of enterprises is analysed. It is substantiated that the sustainable development of enterprises is possible if the interests of stakeholders are taken into account. The problem of choosing projects for the sustainable development of enterprises if the interests of stakeholders are taken into account is described. It is proposed to solve the problem of choosing projects of sustainable development of an enterprise by the method of fuzzy sets, which will allow taking into account the subjective evaluation judgments of stakeholders regarding the amounts of benefits and contributions to projects of corporate sustainable development. Novelty. Based on the generalization of theoretical provisions, the problem is outlined and directions for improving the sustainable development of the enterprise are proposed based on taking into account the interests of stakeholders during the selection of sustainable development projects in order to achieve the global goals of sustainable development at the state level. Practical value. The outlined problem of choosing projects of corporate sustainable development with taking into account the interests of stakeholders and the proposed ways of its solving will allow managers to form more consciously effective management mechanisms for decision-making with the involvement of stakeholders and will condition the achievement of global goals of sustainable development at the state level. 
Keywords:Sustainable development, Stakeholder, Project management, Cluster analysis, Economic interest, Management, Social and economic development, Environmental development, Global goals of sustainable development, Enterprise
File of the article:EV20223_170-180.pdf
Literature:
  • 1. Khaustova, V.Ye., & Omarov, Sh.A. (2018). Kontseptsiia staloho rozvytku yak paradyhma rozvytku suspilstva. Problemy ekonomiky, (1), 265-273. Retrieved from https://www.problecon.com/export_pdf/problems-of-economy-2018-1_0-pag-es-265_273.pdf
  • 2. Zhang, F, & Zhu, L. (2019). Enhancing corporate sustainable development: Stakeholder pressures, organizational learning, and green innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28: 1012-1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2298
  • 3. Rahman, A., Sultana, N. & Mizanur Rahman, M. (2020). «CSR vs Social Business for Sustainable Development», Crowther, D. & Seifi, S. (Ed.) Governance and Sustainability (Developments in Corporate Governance and Responsibility, Vol. 15), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 113-130. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2043-052320200000015007
  • 4. Sisaye, S. (2021). «The influence of non- governmental organizations (NGOs) on the development of voluntary sustainability accounting reporting rules», Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBSED-02-2021-0017
  • 5. Glukhova, V., & Kravchenko, K. (2022). Ekolohichni finansy Ukrainy v umovakh staloho rozvytku. Efektyvna ekonomika, (5). Retrieved from http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=10276 DOI: 10.32702/2307-2105-2022.5.72
  • 6. Reverchuk, S., & Tvorydlo, O. (2022). Formuvannia sotsialno-oriientovanoho finansovoho biznesu v Ukraini. Efektyvna ekonomika, (5). Retrieved from http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=10270 DOI: 10.32702/2307-2105-2022.5.1
  • 7. Shashyna, M., & Mosiychuk, D. (2022). Parametrychni kharakterystyky staloho rozvytku pidpryiemstva. Efektyvna ekonomika, (3). Retrieved from http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=10049 DOI: 10.32702/2307-2105-2022.3.2
  • 8. Blagun, I.S. (2021). Model tsyrkuliarnoi ekonomiky yak odyn iz trendiv staloho rozvytku. Biznes- Inform, (12), 124-132. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2021-12-124-132
  • 9. Korol, S.Ya., Semenova, S.M., & Kurbet, M.A. (2022). Uprovadzhennia zvitnosti pro stalyi rozvytok v Ukraini: stan i perspektyvy v umovakh yevrointehratsii. Biznes-Inform, (1), 294-301. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2022-1-294-301
  • 10. Zubkova, Alina B. et al. (2021). «Sustainable Behavior in International Business: Corporate Social Responsibility for Mimicry or for Business Value?» Business-Inform (11), 425-439. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2021-11-425-439
  • 11. Pogorelov, Yu.S., & Kozachenko, G.V. (2021). Instrumentariy staloho rozvytku pidpryiemstva v umovakh kryzy. Biznes-Inform, (4), 285-293. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2021-4-285-293
  • 12. Zhosan, H.V. (2021). Adaptyvnyi menedzhment i stalyi rozvytok: vzaiemozviazok poniat u konteksti upravlinnia diialnistiu pidpryiemstva v umovakh nevyznachenosti. Biznes-Inform, (3), 179-187. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2021-3-179-187
  • 13. Vieira Nunhes, T., Viviani Garcia, E., Espuny, M., Homem de Mello Santos, V., Isaksson, R., & José de Oliveira, O. (2021). Where to go with corporate sustainability? Opening paths for sustainable businesses through the collaboration between universities, governments, and organizations. Sustainability, 13(3), 1429.
  • 14. Ali, A., Jiang, X., & Ali, A. (2022). Enhancing corporate sustainable development: Organizational learning, social ties, and environmental strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3184
  • 15. Galbreath, J. (2018). Do Boards of Directors Influence Corporate Sustainable Development? An Attention-Based Analysis. Business Strategy and the En- vironment, 27: 742-756. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2028.
  • 16. Mal, H., Varma, M., & Vishvakarma, N.K. (2022), «An empirical study to prioritize the determinants of corporate sustainability performance using analytic hierarchy process», Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-10-2021-0133
  • 17. Chan, R. Y. K., Lai, J. W. M., & Kim, N. (2022). Strategic motives and performance implications of proactive versus reactive environmental strategies in corporate sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(5), 2127-2142. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3011
  • 18. Seroka-Stolka, O., & Fijorek, K. (2020). Enhancing corporate sustainable development: Proactive environmental strategy, stakeholder pressure and the moderating effect of firm size. Business Strategy and the Environment. 29: 2338-2354. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2506
  • 19. Albloushi, B., Alharmoodi, A., Jabeen, F., Mehmood, K., & Farouk, S. (2022). «Total quality management practices and corporate sustainable development in manufacturing companies: the mediating role of green innovation» Management Research Review, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2021-0194
  • 20. Rodríguez, R., Svensson, G., & Wood, G. (2021). «Determining corporate direction in sustainable development: a multi-dimensional framework in B2B», Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-03-2019-0113
  • 21. Erin, O.A., & Bamigboye, O.A. (2022). «Evaluation and analysis of SDG reporting: evidence from Africa». Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 369-396. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-02-2020-0025
Home Archive Copyright © 2024 Economic Bulletin of the National Mining University. All Rights Reserved. Designed by JoomlArt.com. Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU General Public License.