| Annotation: | Methods. The research is based on the use of a systemic approach, which is applied in the construction of the conceptual model of the adaptation of economic security management of an enterprise in the conditions of neo-technological reproduction. Results. The article outlines the need for the formation of an analytical base and diagnostic tools for assessing the quality of business processes, taking into account the economic security system of the enterprise, neo-technologies and neo-ideas, which open up opportunities to ensure the successful functioning of the enterprise in the conditions of neo-technological reproduction. The key differences of the adaptive system of economic security of the enterprise are highlighted, namely: its ability to take into account in the general system of enterprise management its branch specifics and the scale of its activity, stages of the life cycle of operation, the presence or absence of international activity, on the one hand, and its resistance to potentially possible threats, maintaining market stability and liquidity at a sufficient level, on the other hand. Novelty. The conceptual model of the adaptation of the management of economic security of the enterprise in the conditions of neo-technological reproduction has been created, which is based on institutional conditions and specifics of its functioning, as well as factors influencing economic security and system-providing components. Practical value of the research lies in the possibility of using its results to create a system of economic security of the enterprise in the conditions of neo-technological reproduction. |
| Literature: | - 1. Arefieva, O.V., & Poberezhna, Z.M. (2021). Kholistychne upravlinnia adaptyvnistiu pidpryiemstva v umovakh tsyklichnoi ekonomiky. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu Ukrainy «Kyivskyi politekhnichnyi instytut», (18), 64-70. doi.org/10.20535/2307-5651.18.2021.247229
- 2. Danilova E.I. (2020). Metodychnyi pidkhid do otsiniuvannia ekonomichnoi bezpeky realizatsii systemy ekonomichnykh interesiv aviatransportnykh pidpryiemstv. Biznes Inform, (3), 217-222. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2020-3-217-222
- 3. Denysenko, M.P., & Kolisnichenko, P.T. (2017). Priorytetni napriamy posylennia ekonomichnoi bezpeky. Ekonomika ta derzhava, (3), 31-35.
- 4. Zalizniuk, V.P., Safonik, N.P., & Kaia, A.S. (2022). Preventyvne upravlinnia ekonomichnoiu bezpekoiu v umovakh vedennia mizhnarodnoho biznesu. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Mizhnarodni ekonomichni vidnosyny ta svitove hospodarstvo, Issue 41, 42-46. https://doi.org/10.32782/2413-9971/2022-41-8
- 5. Zalutska, Kh.Ya. (2020). Kontseptualni aspekty upravlinnia dyversyfikatsiino-intehratsiinym rozvytkom pidpryiemstv v umovakh neotekhnolohichnoho vidtvorennia. Problemy ekonomiky, (4), 164-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2020-4-164-170
- 6. Kolisnichenko, P.T. (2017). Naukovo-metodychni pidkhody do otsinky rivnia ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemstva. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid, (16), 38-44.
- 7. Kryvobok, K.V. (2018). Obhruntuvannia suchasnoho pidkhodu shchodo adaptatsii pidpryiemstva do nestiykoho zovnishnioho seredovyshcha. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, (14), 412-420.
- 8. Orlyk, O.V. (2015). Analiz faktoriv vplyvu na ekonomichnu bezpeku pidpryiemstv ta metody zakhystu vid zahroz i neitralizatsii yikh naslidkiv. Proceedings from: Trendy ta innovatsii v suchasnii ekonomitsi. O.S. Ivanilov (Ed.). (pp. 154-165). Kharkiv: KhNUBA.
- 9. Piletska, S.T., Korytko, T.Iu., & Kravchuk, N.M. (2022). Mekhanizm zabezpechennia ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemstva. Visnyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy, 1(42), 64-69. https://doi.org/10.37405/1729-7206.2022.1(42).64-69
- 10. Prokhorova, V., Krutova, A., & Diachenko, K. (2022). Ekonomichna bezpeka pidpryiemstv Ukrainy v umovakh destabilizatsiinoho rozvytku. Elektronne naukove fakhove vydannia «Adaptyvne upravlinnia: teoriia i praktyka» Seriia «Ekonomika», Issue 14(28). https://doi.org/10.33296/2707-0654-14(28)-10
- 11. Smerichevskyi, S.F., Arefieva, O.V., & Piletska, S.T. (2022). Formuvannia stratehichnykh rishen pry upravlinni zminamy na pidpryiemstvi. Biznes Inform, (6), 108-117. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2022-6-108-117
- 12. Tulchynska, S.O., & Solosich, O.S. (2022). Kontseptualni zasady zabezpechennia ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemnytstva v umovakh voiennoho stanu. Naukovyi pohliad: ekonomika ta upravlinnia, 3(79), 97-102. https://doi.org/10.32782/2521-666X/2022-79-14
- 13. Kuzior, A.; Arefiev, S., & Poberezhna, Z. (2023). Informatization of innovative technologies for ensuring macroeconomic trends in the conditions of a circular economy. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.01.001
- 14. Lepeyko, T., Oviechkina, O., Shkoda, M., Babiy, L., Goncharenko, I. (2023). The security aspect of the modeling of financial monitoring and accounting of the innovation cluster economic activity. Journal of Hygienic Engineering & Design. 2023, Vol. 42, p. 388-398. 11 p.
- 15. Vasіutkina, N., Vavdiichyk, I., Kondratiuk, O. (2023). Environmental security of Ukraine: integrative aspect. (pp. 168-178). The EU Cohesion policy and healthy national development: Management and promotion in Ukraine. N. Letunovska, L. Saher, A. Rosokhata (Eds.).
|
Archive