| Annotation: | Methods. The research is based on the use of such general scientific methods as: logical and historical – to study the historical conditions of the development of the world economy, which influenced the change of scientific ideas about the nature of the innovation process; general and specific – to establish the specifics of theoretical innovation models; analysis and synthesis – to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of open innovations. Results. The evolution of scientists’ views on the nature of innovation processes is traced in the article. Five dominant theoretical models of innovation are characterized, namely: «technological push», «market involvement», «combination of technological capabilities and market needs», «integrated innovation process», «chain» and «open innovation». The relationship between changes in the economic system of society and the development of scientific ideas about the nature of innovation processes has been established. Specific features of the open innovation model are singled out and directions of its application in the organization of innovative activities of enterprises joining global value chains are demonstrated. The advantages and disadvantages of the model of open innovation in global value chains are demonstrated. Novelty. The scientific novelty of the research results lies in the determination of the possibilities of using various types of open innovations existing at the current stage in global value creation chains, for which their ranking was carried out based on the combination of the value of the level of innovation inclusion in the global value creation chain and the purpose of the enterprise’s activity. Practical value. The results of the study reveal the variability of theoretical ideas about the innovation process depending on the transformations of economic systems, and therefore allow enterprises to choose more effective competitive strategies for their development. |
| Literature: | - 1. KPMG Technology Industry Survey 2021. KPMG LLP: Delaware limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member. 12 p.
- 2. Smiesova, V.L., Fedorova, N.Ye., & Pobyva, V.O. (2020). Innovatsiyi yak osnova sotsialnoekonomichnoho rozvytku krain svitu. Naukovyy visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu, Ser.: Mizhnarodni ekonomichni vidnosyny ta svitove hospodarstvo, Issue 31, 109-115. https://doi.org/10.32782/2413-9971/2020-31-17
- 3. Lytvynenko, N.I. (2023). Innovatsyina aktyvnist v metalurhiynyi haluzi: komparatyvnyi analiz Ukrainy z krainamy YeS. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Dniprovskoi politekhniky, (2), 69-75. https://doi.org/10.33271/ebdut/82.069.
- 4. Pylypenko, Yu.I. (2017). Innovatsyinnyi rozvytok aviabuduvannia Ukrainy yak mekhanizm stymuliuvannia tochok ekonomichnoho zrostannia natsionalnoi ekonomiky. Ekonomichnyi visnyk NHU, 2(58), 62-72.
- 5. Pylypenko, H.M., & Chornobaiev, V.V. (2010). Innovatsiyno-investytsiyna diialnist ta yiyi rehuliuvannia v ekonomitsi Ukrainy. Dnipropetrovsk: Natsionalnyi hirnychyi universytet.
- 6. Pylypenko, H.M., & Chornobaiev, V.V. (2005). Mekhanizm initsiiuvannia innovatsiynoho rozvytku v Ukraini. Ekonomichnyi visnyk NHU, (4), 7-12.
- 7. Ambos, B., Brandl, K., Perri, A., Scalera, V., Assche, Ari Van (2021). The nature of innovation in global value chains. Journal of World Business. Volume 56, Issue 4, 10 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101221.
- 8. Myers, S., & Marquis, D.G. (1969). Successful industrial innovations: a study of factors underlying innovation in selected firms. National Science Foundation. 117 p.
- 9. Mowery, D., & Rosenberg, N. (1979). Influence of market demand upon innovation - critical-review of some recent empirical studies. Research Policy, Volume 8, Issue 2. Pp. 102-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(79)90019-2.
- 10. Kline, S.J., Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The Positive Sum Strategy Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press. Pp. 275-305.
- 11. Marinova, D., & Phillimore, J. (2003). Innovation models. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The International Handbook on Innovation. Oxford: Elsevier. Pp. 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-008044198-6/50005-x
- 12. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke W., & West, J. (2006). Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. UK : Oxford University Press. 373 p. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199290727.001.0001
|
Archive