Economic Bulletin of the National Mining University

 

IssuesSectionsAuthorsKeywords

Article

Issue:2024 №1 (85)
Section:International economic relations
UDK:338.45
DOI:https://doi.org/10.33271/ebdut/85.073
Article language:Ukrainian
Pages:73-80
Title:Sociological discourse of technological development: global challenges and ukrainian realities
Authors:Lazebnyk L. L., State Tax University,
Riabinina N. O., Institute of Food Resources National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine
Annotation:Methods. The methodological basis of the study was such scientific methods as analytical – when summarizing the results of scientific research of domestic and foreign scientists regarding the essence, significance and factors of influence on scientific and technological activity in the country; abstract-logical – when formulating a hypothesis regarding the relationship between social relations of taxation and the economic results of management of innovative and technological development; economic and statistical – during the study of the social characteristics of taxation in Ukraine. Results. Based on the analysis of the scientific works of domestic and foreign scientists, it has been confirmed that technologies promote innovation, create jobs and contribute to long-term economic growth. It was established that such generally recognized factors of influence on scientific and technological activity in the country as industrial, monetary and tax policy, as well as financial encouragement of business to introduce innovations and advanced technologies in combination with organizational changes, require a systematic approach to the introduction and addition of additional regulators depending on the situation. Attention is focused on the need to expand the list of factors influencing social changes, in particular, at the expense of tax sociology. Novelty. It has been established that the field of tax sociology can supplement traditional ideas about the economic model of behavior by determining the fundamental dynamics, the long-term ability to invest in research and technology. Practical value. The results of the research are of an applied nature as such that, based on the analysis of tax statistics, it is possible to predict the far-reaching consequences of the impact of tax sociology on socio-economic changes in general, and scientific and technological development, in particular. 
Keywords:Socio-economic development, Technological development, Factors of technological development, High-tech industry, Scientific and technological activity, Innovations, Innovative development, Intellectual resources, Taxation, Tax policy, Tax sociology
File of the article:EV20241_073-080.pdf
Literature:
  • 1. Kontseptsiia naukovo-tekhnolohichnoho ta innovatsiynoho rozvytku Ukrainy, skhvalena Postanovoiu Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy vid 13 lypnia 1999 roku № 916-XIV. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/916-14#Text
  • 2. Stratehiia ekonomichnoho ta sotsialnoho rozvytku Ukrainy «Shliakhom yevropeyskoi intehratsii» na 2004-2015 roky, zatverdzhena ukazom Prezydenta Ukrainy 28 kvitnia 2004 roku № 493/2004 Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/493/2004#Text
  • 3. Kontseptsiia rozvytku natsionalnoi innovatsiynoi systemy, skhvalena rozporiadzhenniam Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 17.06.2009 r. № 680-r Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/680-2009-%D1%80#Text
  • 4. Stratehiia innovatsiynoho rozvytku Ukrainy na 2010-2020 roky v umovakh hlobalizatsiynykh vyklykiv», skhvalena Postanovoiu Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy vid 21.10.2010 r.. № 2632-VI Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2632-VI#Text
  • 5. Kuzmenko, Yu. Premier-ministr Ukrainy Denys Shmyhal 14 hrudnia skazav, shcho kilka vidomstv spilno napratsovuiut Stratehiiu innovatsiynoho rozvytku derzhavy do 2030 roku. Retrieved from https://suspilne.media/639408-kabmin-pracue-nad-strategieu-innovacijnogo-rozvitku-ukraini-do-2030-roku-smigal/
  • 6. Christine Zhen-Wei Qiang. (2006). «Telecommunications and Economic Growth», Washington, D.C. : World Bank, unpublished paper.
  • 7. Taylor Reynolds. (2009). «The Role of Communication Infrastructure Investment in Economic Recovery», Working Party on Communication Infrastructures and Services Policy, OECD, March, 2009.
  • 8. Erik Brynjolfsson & Adam Saunders. (2009). Wired for Innovation, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • 9. Phusavat, K., Comepa, N., Sitko‐Lutek, A. And Ooi, K. (2011). «Interrelationships between intellectual capital and performance: Empirical examination», Industrial Management & Data Systems, Issue 111, (6), pp. 810-829. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571111144928
  • 10. Amosha, O.I., & Salomatina, L.M. (2017). Innovatsiynyi rozvytok promyslovykh pidpryiemstv u rehionakh: problemy ta perspektyvy. Ekonomika Ukrainy, 3(664), 20-34.
  • 11. Kirdina, O.H. (2011). Obmezhennia ta oriientyry tekhniko-tekhnolohichnoho rozvytku Ukrainy v umovakh hlobalizatsii. Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsiy, (4), T.1, 179-184.
  • 12. Bazhal, Yu.M. & Dombrovska, A.O. (2023). Rezultatyvnist faktoriv ekonomichnoho zrostannia: produktyvnist ta innovatsii. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA, Ekonomichni nauky, T.8, Issue (1), 3-9. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.18523/2519-4739.2023.8.1.3-9
  • 13. Bazhal, Yu.M. (2022). Innovatsiyna ekosystema yak chynnyk zabezpechennia prohresyvnykh strukturnykh zmin v ekonomitsi. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Ekonomichni nauky, Issue 7, (1), 3-9. DOI: 10.18523/2519-4739.2022.7.1.3-9.
  • 14. Yehorov, I.Yu., Bazhal, Yu.M., Kindzerskyi, Yu.V., Sidenko, S.V., Boiko, O.M. «et al.» (2023). Otsinka innovatsiynoho rozvytku ta strukturni transformatsii v ekonomitsi Ukrainy. I.Yu. Yehorova & Yu.V. Kindzerskiy (Eds.). Natsionalna akademiia nauk Ukrainy, Derzhavna ustanova «Instytut ekonomiky ta prohnozuvannia NAN Ukrainy». Kyiv: DU «Instytut ekonomiky ta prohnozuvannia NAN Ukrainy».
  • 15. Material z Vikipedii, vilnoi entsyklopedii «Fiscal sociology». Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiscal_sociology
  • 16. Schumpeter, J.A. (1918). Die Krise des Steuerstaates. In: Zeitfragen aus dem Gebiet der Soziologie (4). Graz/Leipzig.
  • 17. Staatssozialismus oder Staatskapitalismus. Schriften zur Finanzsoziologie, herausgegeben und mit einem Nachwort von Arno Bammé, München/Wien 2020, ISBN 978-3-89019-746-3.
  • 18. Martin, I.W., Mehrotra, A.K., & Prasad, M. (2009). The thunder of history: The origins and development of the new fiscal sociology. In The New Fiscal Sociology Taxation in Comparative and Historical Perspective (pp. 1-28). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627071.002
  • 19. Shvabiy, K.I., & Savchenko, S.O. (2023). Ekonomichni interesy, opodatkuvannia ta spravedlyvist. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Dniprovskoi politekhniky, 4(74), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.33271/ebdut/84.045
  • 20, Bird, R.M. The Tax Kaleidoscope: Perspectives on Tax Reform in Canada. Retrieved from https://www.ctf.ca/ctfweb/Documents/PDF/2002ctj/2002ctj2_brooks.pdf
  • 21. Alberto Alesina & George-Marios Angeletos (2003). «Fairness and Redistribution: U.S. versus Europe» Working Paper 9502, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge MA, February.
  • 22. Akcigit, Ufuk, Salomé, Baslandze, and Stefanie, Stantcheva. 2016. «Taxation and the International Mobility of Inventors». American Economic Review, 106 (10): 2930-81. Retrieved from DOI: 10.1257/aer.20150237
  • 23. Ofitsiinyi sait NBU. Makroekonomichni pokaznyky. Retrieved from https://bank.gov.ua/ua/statistic/macro-indicators#4
  • 24. Ofitsiinyi sait Derzhavnoi sluzhby statystyky Ukrainy. Ekonomichna statystyka: Nauka, tekhnolohii ta innovatsii. Retrieved from https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/