| Annotation: | Methods. In the course of study, the following methods were used: a systematic approach – to identify the components of the agricultural sector’s resilience under martial law; the method of abstraction – to identify the essential features of resilience and sustainability of the national economy; the method of analysis and synthesis – to determine the interrelationships of the components' impact in the overall context of the agricultural sector's resilience; modelling – to develop a theoretical model of the agricultural sector's resilience; induction and deduction – to formulate the study's conclusions. Results. The article identifies the essential features of sustainability and resilience of the national economy. The relationship between the components of resilience and sustainable development of the agricultural sector under martial law is characterised. It is substantiated that in order to ensure sustainable development of the agricultural sector during martial law, it is important to simultaneously take into account its resilience (operational adaptability) and sustainability (environmental, economic and social balance). The main components of the sustainability of the agricultural sector of Ukraine are highlighted: economic, social, environmental, international support, logistics and infrastructure, and technological innovations. It is established that ensuring the resilience of the agricultural sector requires an integrated interaction of these components, since under martial law there is a decrease in cultivated areas, damage to infrastructure, disruptions in logistics and social threats. It is emphasised that the priority of ensuring the economic and environmental resilience of the agricultural sector of Ukraine is necessary not only for its survival under martial law, but also for creating the basis for post-war recovery. It is generalised that the implementation of the circular economy concept will allow combining economic sustainability with the environmental priorities of the agricultural sector, creating conditions for sustainable recovery after the war and strengthening international competitiveness. Novelty. The article proposes a theoretical model of resilience of Ukrainian agricultural sector in the form of a pyramid, the structure of which includes economic, social, environmental, technological and managerial components. The formation of a theoretical model of resilience in the form of a pyramid is an effective approach that emphasises the hierarchical nature of the interaction of key components, each of which has a practical implementation that meets modern challenges. Practical value. The results of the study can be used by institutions in the process of developing measures that promote the stability of the agricultural sector, improve logistics, infrastructure and technological innovation, which in turn supports the effective recovery and functioning of the industry under martial law and its sustainable development after the end of the war. |
| Literature: | - 1. Blanchard, O., Wolfers, J. (2000). The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of European Unemployment: The Aggregate Evidence. The Economic Journal, Vol. 110, № 462, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00518
- 2. Rose, A. (2017). Defining and Measuring Economic Resilience froma Societal, Environmental and Security Perspective (Integrated Disaster Risk Management). 1 st ed. 2017 Edition. Springer, 91 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1533-5_10
- 3. Fikret, B., & Folke, C. (1998). Linking Sociological and Ecological Systems for resilience and sustainability. In Fikret Berkes and Carl Folke, Linking Sociological and Ecological Systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998. P. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5150(00)00067-0
- 4. Chapple, K. (2015). Understanding Local Economic Resilience. OECD CFE. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/regional/webinars-leed-resilience-part1.htm
- 5. Shynkaruk, L.V. (Ed.). (2012). Svitohospodarska dysproportsiinist: osoblyvosti, tendentsii, vplyv na ekonomiku Ukrainy: naukova dopovid. NAN Ukrainy, Instytut ekonomiky ta prohnozuvannia. NAN Ukrainy. Kyiv.
- 6. Boiko, A.V. (2014). Mekhanizmy zabezpechennia stiikosti ekonomiky Ukrainy do hlobalnykh vyklykiv i ryzykiv suchasnosti. Ekonomika i rehion, 3(46), 34-41.
- 7. Kozlovskyi, S.V. (2013). Indykatyvni metody zabezpechennia stiikosti ekonomiky Ukrainy. Efektyvna ekonomika, (9), 30-36.
- 8. Tyshchuk, T.A. Priorytety zabezpechennia zovnishnoi stiikosti ekonomiky Ukrainy. Stratehichni priorytety, 1(26), 52-60.
- 9. Shtunder, I.O. (2017). Pryroda stiikosti sotsialnoi sfery v umovakh shokovykh vplyviv. Ekonomika i suspilstvo, Issue 11, 11-16.
- 10. Zhalilo, Ya.A., Pokryshka, D.S., Belinska, Ya.V., & Berezhnyi, Ya.V. «et al.». (2012). Pisliakryzovyi rozvytok ekonomiky Ukrainy: zasady stratehii modernizatsii. Kyiv: NISD.
- 11. Ukraine. Disaster and Risk profile: Basic Country Statistics and Indicators (2014). UNISDR. PreventionWeb. 2017. Retrieved from https://www.preven-tionweb.net/countries/ukr/data/
- 12. Boiko, A.V., Shkuropadska, D.B., Hladka Yu.A. «et al.». (2021). Stiikist ekonomiky: otsiniuvannia ta zabezpechennia. A.V. Boiko (Ed.). Kyiv: Kyivskyi natsionalnyi torhivelno-ekononomichnyi universytet.
- 13. Ahn, S. (2002). Competition, innovation and productivity growth: A review of theory and evidence. OECD: Economics Department Working Papers, № 317, 77 r. https://doi.org/10.1787/182144868160
- 14. Artis, M.J., & Okubo, T. (2009). Globalization and business cycle transmission. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 20, 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2009.03.002
- 15. Kvasha, S., Pavlenko, O., & Kliementiev, D. (2024). Novi trendy v obsiahakh vyrobnytstva valovoi i tovarnoi produktsii ahrarnoho sektoru Ukrainy za katehoriiamy vyrobnykiv ta rynkamy produktsiI. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, (66). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-66-8
- 16. Pylypenko, Yu.I. (2010). Tekhnolohichna struktura natsionalnoi ekonomiky: teoriia, praktyka ta rehuliuvannia. Dnipropetrovsk: Natsionalnyi hirnychyi universytet.
- 17. Prushkivska, E.V. (2013). Neoindustrializatsiia yak protses onovlennia vtorynnoho sektoru ekonomiky v period ekonomichnoi nestabilnosti. Teoretychni ta prykladni pytannia ekonomiky, Vyp. 28, T.1, 191-197
- 18. Ahrarnyi sektor Ukrainy u 2023 rotsi: skladovi stiikosti, problemy ta perspektyvni zavdannia. Retrieved from https://niss.gov.ua/doslidzhennya/ekonomika/ahrarnyy-sektor-ukrayiny-u-2023-rotsi-skladovi-stiykosti-prob-lemy-ta
- 19. Nehrei, M.V., Trofimtseva, O. V., (2022). Analiz funktsionuvannia ahrarnoho sektoru Ukrainy v umovakh viiny. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V.N. Karazina, Ser. «Ekonomichna», (102), 49-56 doi.org/10.26565/2311-2379-2022-102-06
|
Archive