Economic Bulletin of the National Mining University

 

IssuesSectionsAuthorsKeywords

Article

Issue:2021 №2 (74)
Section:Economic theory
UDK:339.972
DOI:https://doi.org/10.33271/ebdut/74.021
Article language:Ukrainian
Pages:21-35
Title:Competitiveness of the intellectual ecosystem of Ukraine: institutional and regulatory aspect
Author:Niameshchuk H. V., Prydniprovska State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture
Annotation:Methods. The results of the research have been obtained during the application of such type of methods as scientific abstraction and explication in defining the «intellectual ecosystem», induction, deduction, analysis and synthesis, structural and functional, institutional analysis to track patterns and dynamics of intellectual ecosystem of Ukraine from the standpoint of its competitiveness. Results. It has been found that Ukraine is significantly inferior in competitive positions to countries – intellectual leaders (Israel, South Korea, Taiwan, Sweden, Japan, Austria, Germany, Denmark, USA, Finland) and, in contrast, is characterized by a blurred division of R&D management functions between national public and foreign customers. It has been established that long-term institutional and regulatory transformations in the scientific sphere of Ukraine in the medium term have destabilized the development of intellectual resources and potential as well as the formation of an intellectual platform. It has been determined that the underfunding of national institutions – the main producers of scientific and technical products, initiators of applications for registration of intellectual property, participants in international scientific, technical and educational cooperation, in the emergency of the political situation in Ukraine – is explained by the relevance of social and infrastructural cross-border cooperation programs. Objectively assessing the above facts, the author concludes that the process of formation of the intellectual ecosystem of Ukraine continues. Novelty. In the course of the research of defining «intellectual ecosystem» the author's definition has been suggested as well the vision of its architecture and component filling in modern realities of Ukraine has been formed. It has been revealed that today the specifics of the institutional and regulatory support of the R&D sphere have a dominant influence on the competitiveness of the intellectual ecosystem of Ukraine. Practical value. The differences identified in the methodological approaches of international and national government institutions concerning the assessment of the intellectual ecosystem, the disproportion of funding for research in Ukraine, the imperfection of the mechanisms of program and grant support of research institutions can serve as a basis for improving the corresponding public policy. 
Keywords:Intellectual ecosystem, Intellectual platform, Intellectual potential, R & D, International competitiveness, Ukraine, Institutional and regulatory support
File of the article:EV20212_021-035.pdf
Literature:
  • 1. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy (2015). Zakon Ukrainy «Pro naukovu i naukovo-tekhnichnu diialnist» № 848-VIII vid 26.11.2015 r. (redaktsiia vid 03.09.2020 r.) : Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/848-19#Text.
  • 2. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy (2018). Zakon Ukrainy «Pro Derzhavnyi biudzhet Ukrainy na 2019 rik» vid 23.11.2018 r. № 2629-VIII (redaktsiia vid 13.12.2019 r.). Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2629-19#Text.
  • 3. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy (2014). Statystychnyi shchorichnyk Ukrainy za 2013 rik. O.H. Osaulenko (Ed.). Kyiv: Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2014/zb/10/sz_2013_uk.zip.
  • 4. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy (2019). Statystychnyi shchorichnyk Ukrainy za 2018 rik. I.M. Zhuk (Ed.). Zhytomyr: TOV «Buk-Druk». Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2019/zb/11/zb_yearbook_2018.pdf.
  • 5. Derzhavnyi komitet statystyky Ukrainy (2008). Statystychnyi shchorichnyk Ukrainy 2007. O.H. Osaulenko (Ed.). Kyiv: Derzhavnyi komitet statystyky Ukrainy. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/st_sc/st_sc2007_uk.zip.
  • 6. Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrainy (2020). Derzhavnyi reiestr naukovykh obiektiv, shcho stanovliat natsionalne nadbannia. Retrieved from https://data.gov.ua/dataset/e1a0ac4b-e96d-4dbc-8e7e-b1c97bfec27e.
  • 7. Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrainy, Ukrainskyi instytut naukovo-tekhnichnoi i ekonomichnoi informatsii (2015). Stan rozvytku nauky i tekhniky, rezultaty naukovoi, naukovo-tekhnichnoi, innovatsiinoi diialnosti, transferu tekhnolohii za 2014 rik. Analitychna dovidka. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/nauka/informatsiyno-analitychni/stan-rozvitku-nauki-i-tekhniki-ta-rezultativnist.pdf.
  • 8. Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrainy, Ukrainskyi instytut naukovo-tekhnichnoi i ekonomichnoi informatsii (2016). Stan rozvytku nauky i tekhniky, rezultaty naukovoi, naukovo-tekhnichnoi, innovatsiinoi diialnosti, transferu tekhnolohii za 2015 rik. Analitychna dovidka. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/nauka/informatsiyno-analitychni/2-3-ad-kmu-2015.pdf.
  • 9. Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrainy, Ukrainskyi instytut naukovo-tekhnichnoi ekspertyzy ta informatsii (2017). Stan rozvytku nauky i tekhniky, rezultaty naukovoi i naukovo-tekhnichnoi diialnosti za 2016 rik. Analitychna dovidka. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/nauka/informatsiyno-analitychni/na-sajt-mon-ad-kmu-11.07.17.pdf.
  • 10. Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrainy, Ukrainskyi instytut naukovo-tekhnichnoi ekspertyzy ta informatsii (2018). Stan rozvytku nauky i tekhniky, rezultaty naukovoi i naukovo-tekhnichnoi diialnosti za
  • 2017 rik. Analitychna dovidka. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/nauka/informatsiyno-analitychni/AD_NAUKA_2017.pdf.
  • 11. Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrainy, Ukrainskyi instytut naukovo-tekhnichnoi ekspertyzy ta informatsii (2019). Stan rozvytku nauky i tekhniky, rezultaty naukovoi i naukovo-tekhnichnoi diialnosti za
  • 2018 rik. Analitychna dovidka. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/nauka/informatsiyno-analitychni/2019/07/12/kmu2018final.pdf.
  • 12. Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrainy, Ukrainskyi instytut naukovo-tekhnichnoi ekspertyzy ta informatsii (2020). Naukova i naukovo-tekhnichna diialnist v Ukraini u 2019 rotsi. Naukovo-analitychna dopovid. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/nauka/informatsiyno-analitychni/2020/08/13/nadnaukaza2019-stisnuto.pdf.
  • 13. Brooking, A. (1997). Intellectual Capital, London, International Thomson Business Press. 204 p. Retrieved from https://archive.org/stream/intellectualcapi0000broo#page/n7/mode/2up.
  • 14. Eurostat (2020). Intramural R&D expenditure (GERD) by source of funds. Last update: 24-09-2020. Retrieved from https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do.
  • 15. Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M.A. (2013). Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation, J Prod Innov Manag 31. No. 3 (September 4). P. 417-433. Retrieved from https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/98590/Cusumano_Industry%20platforms.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
  • 16. Kelly, K. (1998). New Rules for the New Economy: 10 radical strategies for a connected world, New York, Penguin Books. 180 p. Retrieved from https://archive.org/stream/newrulesfornewec00kell_0#page/n195/mode/2up.
  • 17. Nelkin, D. (1984). Science as Intellectual Property: Who Controls research? New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. 146 p. Retrieved from https://archive.org/stream/scienceasintelle0000nelk#page/n3/mode/2up.
  • 18. Nyameshchuk, A.V. (2014). Rapporto delle tecnologie dell'informazione e della comunicazione nella realizzazione di 'economia in rete'. Italian Science Review. Issue 3(12). pp. 400-403. Retrieved from http://www.ias-journal.org/archive/2014/march/Nyameshchuk.pdf.
  • 19. Nyameshchuk, A.V., Boiko, V.O., Verkhoglyadova, N.I., Volska, O.M., & Hranovska, V.H. (2020). The Intellectual-Knowledge Imperative of the Global Economy in the 21st Century. Scientific approaches to modernizing the economic system: vector of development: collective monograph (Research School for Socio-Economic and Natural Sciences of the Environment - SENSE). Lviv-Toruń: Liha-Pres. 352 p., pp. 212-232.
  • 20. Organization for economic Cooperation and Development (2020). Main Science and Technology Indicators, OECD.stat. Retrieved from https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=MSTI_PUB.
  • 21. Ritchhart, R. (2002). Intellectual Character: What it is, Why It Metters and How To Get it? San Francisco: Jossei-Bass. 340 p. Retrieved from https://archive.org/stream/intellectualchar0000ritc_g9v6#page/n7/mode/2up.
  • 22. Tiwana, A. (2014). Platform ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy. Waltham, Morgan Kaufmannis an imprint of Elsevier.
  • 304 p. Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5ba7b499755be22c410b1cae/t/5d619cf14aa7270001322054/1566678272862/Platform+Ecosystems.pdf.
Home Archive Copyright © 2024 Economic Bulletin of the National Mining University. All Rights Reserved. Designed by JoomlArt.com. Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU General Public License.