| Annotation: | Methods. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research is the provisions of the concept of Global Public Governance, the modern theory of public administration and international humanitarian law. To achieve the set goal, a set of general scientific and specific research methods was used: system analysis – to study the structure of the legal mechanism of public administration of the humanitarian space; institutional analysis – to determine the role of international organizations in the formation of global humanitarian policy; comparative legal method – in the study of international legal acts and mechanisms of their implementation; structural and functional analysis – to substantiate the relationships between the components of the legal mechanism; scientific generalization method – in the formation of the author's model of the legal mechanism of public administration of the humanitarian space. Results. It was established that in the conditions of modern global challenges, the humanitarian space is transformed into an independent object of global public administration, the effectiveness of which is determined by the quality of multi-level institutional interaction. A structural and functional model of the legal mechanism is proposed, which structurally includes regulatory, institutional, managerial, monitoring and responsibility blocks. Novelty. The scientific novelty lies in the development of theoretical provisions on public management of the humanitarian space by integrating the concept of Global Public Governance into the study of the legal mechanism of its functioning. For the first time, a structural and functional model of the legal mechanism of public management of the humanitarian space at the global level is proposed, which considers it as an open multi-level system of interaction of international legal, institutional, organizational and digital management tools, united by the single goal of ensuring humanitarian security, protecting human rights and sustainable development. Practical value. The proposed model can be used by state authorities, international organizations, higher education institutions and scientific institutions in the development of conceptual documents, programs for the development of the humanitarian sphere and conducting further scientific research. |
| Literature: | - 1. Pierre, J., & Peters, B.G. (2000). Governance, Politics and the State. London: Macmillan Press. Re- trieved from https://archive.org/details/governancepoliti0000pier_n3u4/page/n1/mode/2up
- 2. Bevir, M. (2013). Governance: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199606412.001.0001
- 3. Weiss, T.G., & Wilkinson, R. (2018). Rethink- ing Global Governance: Complexity, Authority, Power, Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- 4. OECD, & The World Bank. (2013). Integrating Human Rights into Development: Donor Approaches, Experiences and Challenges (2nd ed.). Paris: OECD Publishing.
- 5. Barnett, M. (2013). Humanitarian Governance. Annual Review of Political Science, (16), 379-398. Re- trieved from https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-012512-083711
- 6. Weiss, T.G. (2016). Global Governance: Why? What? Whither? Cambridge: Polity Press.
- 7. Barnett, M. N., Pevehouse, J. C. W., & Rausti- ala, K. (Eds.). (2021). Global Governance in a World of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108915199
- 8. Bashtannyk, V. (2012). Humanizatsiia publichnoho upravlinnia yak imperatyv derzhavno-upravlinskykh transformatsii [Humanization of Public Administration as an Imperative of Public Administration Transformations]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii derzhavnoho upravlinnia pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy, (4), 5-13. Retrieved from http://ir.nmu.org.ua/handle/123456789/162985
- 9. Opanashchuk, P. (2025). Pryntsypy, standarty ta tsinnosti humanitarnoi polityky YeS. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Derzhavne upravlinnia, 21(1), 11-15. https://doi.org/10.17721/2616-9193.2025/21-2/11
- 10. Lypovska, N.A. (Ed.). (2024). Suchasnyi sotsiohumanitarnyi prostir krain Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu: publichnoupravlinski aspekty. Dnipro: NTU «Dniprovska Politekhnika».
- 11. Makurin, A.A., & Makurina, O.A. (2025). Derzhavne upravlinnia vyshchoiu osvitoiu v umovakh pandemii COVID-19: analiz kryzovykh adaptatsii ta systemnykh transformatsii. Economic Bulletin of Dnipro University of Technology, 2(90), 225-234. https://doi.org/10.33271/ebdut/90.225
- 12. Drahomyretska, N.M. Pidhotovka fakhivtsiv v sferi publichnoho upravlinnia: zarubizhni novitni pidkhody. Retrieved from https://ir.nmu.org.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/75e0ce0b-96a4-47f9-a009-9a8e229ba9b5/content?utm_source=chatgpt.com
- 13. Orhanizatsiia Obiednanykh Natsii. Statut Orhanizatsii Obiednanykh Natsii: mizhnarodnyi dokument vid 26 chervnia 1945 r. Nabrav chynnosti 24 zhovtnia 1945 r. Retrieved from United Nations Charter (full text)
- 14. Rada Yevropy. Konventsiia pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod : mizhnarodnyi dokument vid 4 lystopada 1950 r. Retrieved from European Convention on Human Rights
- 15. International Organization for Migration. Constitution of the International Organization for Migration. Geneva: International Organization for Migra- tion, 2021. (Constitution and Basic Texts, 3rd ed.). Retrieved from Constitution and Basic Texts (3rd ed.)
- 16. Upravlinnia OON z koordynatsii humanitarnykh pytan (OCHA). Plan humanitarnoho reahuvannia dlia Ukrainy (Ukraine Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan, HRP) 2025. Niu-York; Zheneva: OCHA, 2025. Retrieved from ofitsiinyi dokument HRP 2025
- 17. United Nations (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
- 18. Ministerstvo rozvytku ekonomiky, torhivli ta silskoho hospodarstva Ukrainy. Dobrovilnyi natsionalnyi ohliad shchodo dosiahnennia Tsilei staloho rozvytku v Ukraini: 2015-2019 roky. Kyiv, 2020. 176 s. Retrieved from Dobrovilnyi natsionalnyi ohliad shchodo Tsilei staloho rozvytku v Ukraini
|
Archive