| Annotation: | Methods. The study is based on a harmonious combination of general scientific and specific methods, which ensured the objectivity, integrity and reliability of the formulated conclusions. The choice of methodological basis is determined by the specifics of digital governance as a complex socio-technical system, the study of which requires an interdisciplinary synthesis of public administration, information law and cybersecurity. Thanks to the system-structural and systemfunctional analysis, the digital governance infrastructure is conceptualized as an integral object of public administration. The application of these methods allowed to decompose the specifiedinfrastructure into interconnected levels and to reveal the functional interaction between them. The institutional analysis method was used to study the regulatory and organizational support of digital transformation, in particular the distribution of powers between public administration entities, the functioning of the CDTO institute. Results. It was established that digital governance today requires a balance between the openness of services and data security. Its systemic resilience lies in the ability of state platforms to adapt to threats, operate smoothly and quickly recover from crisis situations. The strategic priorities of state regulation of digital infrastructure are substantiated, among which ensuring full data interoperability according to the Once Only principle, transition to cloud technologies, adherence to the Digital by Design approach, as well as guaranteeing barrier-free and accessible digital services are of key importance. Harmonization of these priorities with international standards is a prerequisite for the integration of the national digital space into the global environment. Novelty. The digital governance infrastructure as an object of public administration influence is structured by isolating and systematizing interconnected levels, which allows for point and systemic regulation of digital transformations. Practical value. There have been formulated conceptual principles for ensuring the systemic stability of the digital governance infrastructure as the dynamic ability of the public administration system to adapt to destructive influences, maintain the continuity of public services, and restore functionality through a phased combination of technological and cybersecurity, functional and procedural, and institutional and personnel dimensions. A model for optimizing public administration of digital infrastructure in times of crisis is substantiated, which is based on a combination of decentralized interagency interaction, preventive relocation of databases to foreign cloud storage and the efficiency of anti-crisis platform solutions. Consolidation of state registers and institutional strengthening of cyber protection at the level of local governments will require further strengthening as a tool for increasing the adaptability of digital systems. |
| Literature: | - 1. Korchak, N., Rachynskyi, A., & Larina, N. (2023). Tsyfrova transformatsiia ta elektronne vriaduvannia: naukovi pidkhody doslidzhennia v sferi publichnoho upravlinnia ta administruvannia. Aspekty publichnoho upravlinnia, T.11, (3), 43-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15421/152334.
- 2. Nahaiev, V., Hirzheva, O., Chalyi, I., & Minenko, S. (2024). Digital transformatsii publichnykh komunikatsii, kiberbezpeky ta tsyfrovoho liderstva v systemi elektronnoho uriaduvannia. Elektronne naukove vydannia «Publichne administruvannia ta natsionalna bezpeka», 4(45), 78-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25313/2617-572X-2024-4-9837.
- 3. Holoborodko, T., & Dubina, O. (2018). Vykorystannia informatsiinykh tekhnolohii v publichnomu administruvanni: dosvid Ukrainy ta yevropeiski oriientyry. Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok,. (6). Retrieved from http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=1260.
- 4. Herasymiuk, K. (2021). Mekhanizmy derzhavnoho upravlinnia kiberta informatsiinoiu bezpekoiu: problemy ta shliakhy vyrishennia. Ekonomika, upravlinnia ta administruvannia, 3(97), 36-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.26642/ema-2021-3(97)-36-40.
- 5. Zhekalo, H., Zaiats, M., & Vakun, O. (2020). Sutnist ta zmist elektronnoho uriaduvannia: kontseptualnyi vymir. Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok, (8). doi: 10.32702/2307-2156-2020.8.52.
- 6. Zabeivorota, T. (2017). Suchasna kontseptsiia e-vriaduvannia yak osnova modernizatsii systemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia. Aktualni problemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 1(51), 35-42.
- 7. Mazur, O. (2019). Suchasni tendentsii uprovadzhennia elektronnoho uriaduvannia v publichnomu upravlinni: zarubizhnyi dosvid. Aspekty publichnoho upravlinnia, T. 7, (12), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.15421/151974
- 8. Pro khmarni posluhy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 17 liutoho 2022 r. № 2075-IX. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (2023), № 15, St. 52.
- 9. Pro osnovni zasady zabezpechennia kiberbezpeky Ukrainy : Zakon Ukrainy vid 5 zhovtnia 2017 r. № 2163-VIII. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (2017), № 45, St. 403.
- 10. Konstytutsiia Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 28 chervnia 1996 r. № 254k/96-VR. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady (1996),. № 30, St. 141. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text.
- 11. Pro zakhyst personalnykh danykh: Zakon Ukrainy vid 01 chervnia 2010 r. № 2297-VI. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (2010), № 34, St. 481. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2297-17#Text.
- 12. Pro osoblyvosti nadannia publichnykh (elektronnykh publichnykh) posluh: Zakon Ukrainy vid 15 lypnia 2021 r. № 1689-IX. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (2021). № 47, St. 383. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1689-20#Text.
- 13. Yak Ukraini staty chastynoiu tsyfrovoho prostoru YeS. Retrieved from https://thedigital.gov.ua/news/technologies/yak-ukraini-stati-chastinoyu-tsifrovogo-prostoru-es-proveli-seminar-dlya-ministerstv.
- 14. Digital by default («tsyfrovyi za zamovchanniam»). Retrieved from https://oldegap.eef.org.ua/projects/digital-by-default-tsyfrovyi-za-zamovchanniam/.
- 15. Vprovadzhennia yevropeiskykh standartiv sumisnosti: Ukraina i YeS pohodyly plan implementatsii Interoperable Europe Act. Retrieved from https://thedigital.gov.ua/news/technologies/vprovadzennia-yevropeyskykh-standartiv-sumisnosti-ukrayina-i-yes-pohodyly-plan-implementatsiyi-interoperable-europe-act.
- 16. BCP (Business Continuity Plan) ta DRP (Disaster Recovery Plan). Suchasni pidkhody do Kiberbezpeky ta Biznes-Zakhystu. Retrieved from https://eska.global/blog/bcp-business-continuity-plan-ta-drp-disaster-recovery-plan-suchasni-pidhodi-do-kiberbezpeki-ta-biznes-zahistu_1.
- 17. Vid GDPR do NIS2: chomu zakhyst personalnykh danykh bilshe ne dorivniuie kiberbezpetsi. Retrieved from https://yur-gazeta.com/dumka-eksperta/vid-gdpr-do-nis2-chomu-zahist-personalnih-danih-bilshe-ne-dorivnyue-kiberbezpeci.html.
- 18. Publichnyi kodeks na praktytsi. Yak proiekt X-Road stav uspishnym mizhnarodnym proiektom z vidkrytym kodom. Retrieved from https://ua.linkedin.com/pulse/public-code-practice-how-estonia-x-road-project-became?tl=uk.
- 19. Khto taki CDTO, yak vony tsyfrovizuiut rehiony ta stvoriuiut komfortni posluhy dlia kozhnoho ukraintsia. Retrieved from https://bit.ua/blog_columns/hto-taki-cdto/.
|
Archive