Economic Bulletin of the National Mining University

 

IssuesSectionsAuthorsKeywords

Article

Issue:2026 №3 (95)
Section:Public management and administration
UDK:351.86:352.071(477)
DOI:https://doi.org/10.33271/ebdut/95.302
Article language:Ukrainian
Pages:302-314
Title:Formation of an integrated system of proper security governance and crisis management at the subnational level in the conditions of military threats
Authors:Karamyshev D. V., V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University,
Suvorov V. P., Kharkiv National Medical University
Annotation:Methods. To achieve the research objective, institutional, semantic, and analytical methods were employed to systematize security concepts and the actors involved in security governance amidst military threats. Content analysis and the normative method were used to organize the legal and regulatory framework, publications, and instructional-methodological materials in the field of security governance. Results. The theoretical and methodological foundations of the formation of an integrated system of good security governance (Good Security Governance) and Crisis Management at the subnational level in conditions of military threats are substantiated. The essence of security governance as a multi-level system (strategic, operational, tactical levels) is revealed, which unites the efforts of state authorities, local governments, non-state institutions and the public to protect against conventional and hybrid challenges. The important role of cooperation between territorial communities and preventive mechanisms in ensuring comprehensive security at the local level is proven. It is substantiated that the construction of an integrated system of security governance and crisis management requires proper coordination, the use of high-tech solutions and clear tactical algorithms. Novelty. For the first time, there has been conceptualized, substantiated the concept of an integrated system of Good Security Governance and Crisis Management, which is focused on implementing the concept of national resilience, comprehensive integrated security, as well as intersubject interaction, ensuring flexibility, adaptability and efficiency of actions at the strategic, operational and tactical levels of management in the face of conventional and hybrid threats, as well as terminologically recorded in the discourse of public management and administration. Practical value. The development of the proposed integrated system will help ensure continuous coordination of state, military, public, and business entities of governance (inter-entity interaction), their readiness, and synchronism of decisions at the operational and tactical levels. 
Keywords:Multi-level governance, Good security governance, National security strategy, Integrated crisis management, Comprehensive security, Local self-government, Cooperation of territorial communities, Military threats, Smart security
File of the article:EV20263_302-314.pdf
Literature:
  • 1. Detsentralizatsiia v Ukraini. Yak Velykoburlutska hromada Kharkivshchyny adaptuietsia do umov viiny (2022). Retrieved from https://decentralization.gov.ua/news/15662
  • 2. Zaluzhnyi, V.F. (2026). Transformatsiia mizhnarodnoho bezpekovoho seredovyshcha ta adaptatsiia derzhavnoho upravlinnia Ukrainy v umovakh hibrydnoho bahatodomennoho protystoiannia. Military Strategy and Technology, 2(5), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.63978/3083-6476.2026.2.5.01
  • 3. Karamyshev, D.V., & Gordiyenko, L.P. (2023). Taktychna bezpeka yak skladova natsionalnoi bezpeky ta vseokhopliuiuchoi oborony za umov konventsiinoi i hibrydnoi viiny. Teoriia ta praktyka derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 2(77), 188-205. https://doi.org/10.26565/1727-6667-2023-2-11
  • 4. Karamyshev, D., Hordienko, L., & Suvorov, V. (2025). Kontseptualni zasady intehrovanoi systemy kryzovoho upravlinnia ta zabezpechennia stiikosti za transformatsiinykh umov. Publichne upravlinnia ta rehionalnyi rozvytok, (28), 583-605. https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2025.28.13
  • 5. Karamyshev, D.V., & Suvorov, V.P. (2024). Hlobalne vriaduvannia ta kompleksna bezpeka: intehratsiini aspekty formu-vannia hlobalnoi ekosystemy stiikosti v umovakh hibrydnykh zahroz. Teoriia ta praktyka derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 1(78), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.26565/1727-6667-2024-1-01
  • 6. Lann, S. (2016). Vyklyky vriaduvanniu v sektori bezpeky Ukrainy ta naikrashchi mizhnarodni praktyky. Proceedings from MIIM ‘I6 I Mizhnarodna konferentsiia «Monitorynh vyklykiv uriaduvanniu v sektori bezpeky Ukrainy: stan i potreby» (Kyiv, 21-22 sich. 2016 r.). (pp.15-20). Kyiv: DCAF, Tsentr Razumkova, https://www.dcaf.ch/sites/default/files/publications/documents/2016_Conference-Proceedings1_ukr.pdf
  • 7. Manuilova, K.V., Pirozhenko, N.V., & Chistyakova, I.M. (2025). Yevropeiski stratehii mizhsektornoi vzaiemodii cherez proiektnyi pidkhid u publichnomu upravlinni. Ekonomichnyi prostir, (197), 187-192. https://doi.org/10.30838/EP.197.187-192
  • 8. Matviychuk, A.V. (2026). Transformatsiia mistsevoho vriaduvannia v Ukraini v umovakh voiennoho stanu: vyklyky instytutsiinoi stiikosti terytorialnykh hromad. Politolohichnyi visnyk, 100(3), 236-253. https://doi.org/10.17721/2415-881x.2026.100.3.236-253
  • 9. Novak-Kalyaeva, L. M., & Kalyaev, A. O. (2026). Hlobalne upravlinnia u sferi bezpeky: filosofskyi zapyt i praktychni interpretatsii. Efektyvnist derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 1(86), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.36930/508605
  • 10. Olshanskyi, O.V. (2024). Mizhsektoralna vzaiemodiia yak odyn iz vazhlyvykh instrumentiv dlia pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti rishen u sferi publichnoho upravlinnia. Derzhava ta rehiony. Ser. : Publichne upravlinnia i administruvannia, (4), 230-234. https://doi.org/10.32782/1813-3401.2024.4.34
  • 11. Zakon Ukrainy Pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo zapobihannia nadzvychainym sytuatsiiam ta likvidatsii yikh naslidkiv, formuvannia fondu zakhysnykh sporud tsyvilnoho zakhystu, stvorennia klasiv ta tsentriv bezpeky. vid 10.02.2026 № 4778-IX. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2026). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4778-20#Text
  • 12. Zakon Ukrainy Pro mistseve samovriaduvannia v Ukrainy vid 21.05.1997 № 280/97-VR. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. 1997. № 24. St. 170. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/280/97-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text
  • 13. Zakon Ukrainy Pro natsionalnu bezpeku Ukrainy vid 21.06.2018 № 2469-VIII. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. 2018. № 31. St. 241. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2469-19#Text
  • 14. Zakon Ukrainy Pro spivrobitnytstvo terytorialnykh hromad vid 17.06.2014 № 1508-VII. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. 2014. № 34. St. 1167. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1508-18#Text
  • 15. Pro rishennia Rady natsionalnoi bezpeky i oborony Ukrainy vid 14 veresnia 2020 roku «Pro Stratehiiu natsionalnoi bezpeky Ukrainy»: Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy vid 14.09.2020 № 392/2020. Retrieved from URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/392/2020#Text
  • 16. Samoilenko, L.L., & Shcherbatyuk, Yu.P. (2025). Osoblyvosti upravlinnia obiednanymy terytorialnymy hromadamy v umovakh voiennoho stanu: vyklyky ta perspektyvy. Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok, (5), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2156.2025.5.18.
  • 17. Suvorov, V.P. (2024). Intehrovane bahatorivneve vriaduvannia i konverhentsiia kontseptsii publichnoho upravlinnia v umovakh hlobalnykh vyklykiv. Derzhavne budivnytstvo, 1(35), 98-109. https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-2337-2024-1-08.
  • 18. Suvorov, V.P. (2025b). Suvorov V.P. Mizhsektoralna vzaiemodiia yak mekhanizm realizatsii bahatorivnevoho vriaduvannia na subnatsionalnomu rivni za transformatsiinykh umov. Teoriia ta praktyka derzhavnoho upravlinnia. 2025. Vyp. 1(80), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.26565/1727-6667-2025-1-05.
  • 19. Suvorov, V.P. (2025a). Spivrobitnytstvo terytorialnykh hromad yak instrument rehionalnoho rozvytku v konteksti bahatorivnevoho vriaduvannia na subnatsionalnomu rivni. Derzhavne budivnytstvo, 1(37), 385-398. https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-2337-2025-1-28
  • 20. Fedorova, A. (2020). Bezpekovi kontseptsii: meta ta zavdannia dlia hromadskosti. Publichne uriaduvannia, 5(25), 256-268. https://doi.org/10.32899/2617-2224-2020-5(25)-256-268.
  • 21. Ball, N. (2002). Enhancing security sector governance: A conceptual framework for UNDP. United Nations Development Programme. New York : UNDP, (2). 9 October. Retrieved from URL: http://www.ssrnetwork.net/uploaded_files/3202.pdf
  • 22. Ball, N., Bouta, T., & van de Goor, L. (2003). Enhancing democratic governance of the security sector: An institutional assessment framework. The Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/20030800_cru_paper_ball.pdf
  • 23. Bevir, M., & Hall, I. (2013). The rise of security governance. M. Bevir, O. Daddow, & I. Hall (Eds.), Interpreting global security (pp. 17-34). Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284317408_The_Rise_of_Security_Governance
  • 24. Bryden, A., & Hänggi, H. (Eds.). (2005). Security governance in post-conflict peacebuilding. Münster: Lit Verlag. Retrieved from https://www.dcaf.ch/security-governance-post-conflict-peacebuilding
  • 25. Liao, D. (2012). Security governance: An alternative paradigm? International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(1), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJSSH.2012.V2.62
  • 26. European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats. (n.d.). Official website. Retrieved from https://www.hybridcoe.fi/
  • 27. European Commission. (2001). European governance: A white paper (COM(2001) 428 final). Official Journal of the European Communities, C 287, 1-29. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/doc_01_10
  • 28. Heininen, L. (2023). «Comprehensive security» - A prerequisite for sustainable development. In L. Heininen (Ed.), Towards a sustainable Arctic (pp. 19-42). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9781800613225_0002
  • 29. Karamyshev, D., Suvorov, V., Didok, Y., Sobol, R., & Myrna, M. (2024). Multi-level public administration in the context of hybrid threats. Social and Legal Studios, 7(2), 44-54. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals2.2024.44
  • 30. Krahmann, E. (2003). Conceptualizing security governance. Cooperation and Conflict, 38(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836703038001001
  • 31. Krahmann, E. (2005). Security governance and the private military industry in Europe and North America. Conflict, Security & Development, 5(2), 247-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678800500170209
  • 32. Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces. (2015). Security sector governance: Applying the principles of good governance to the security sector (SSR Backgrounder Series). DCAF. Retrieved from https://www.dcaf.ch/security-sector-governance-applying-principles-good-governance-security-sector-0
  • 33. Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. (2022). Security sector governance and reform: Guidelines for OSCE staff. OSCE. Retrieved from https://cdn.osce.org/sites/default/files/f/documents/2/4/512470_0.pdf
  • 34. Sperling, J., & Webber, M. (2014). Security governance in Europe: A return to system. European Security, 23(2), 126-144. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2013.856305
  • 35. Wagnsson, C., Sperling, J., & Hallenberg, J. (Eds.). (2009). European security governance: The European Union in a Westphalian world (1st ed.). Routledge. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203875971
  • 36. Webber, M., Croft, S., Howorth, J., Terriff, T., & Krahmann, E. (2004). The governance of European security. Review of International Studies, 30(1), 3-26. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210504005807
  • 37. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. (2009). What is good governance? UN ESCAP. Retrieved from https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/good-governance.pdf
Home Archive Copyright © 2026 Economic Bulletin of the National Mining University. All Rights Reserved. Designed by JoomlArt.com. Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU General Public License.