| Annotation: | Methods. The study employs a systematic approach to analyze mechanisms for ensuring financial security of business entities. Comparative analysis methods were applied to identify key features of state support programs in the European Union, the USA, Japan, and South Korea. Modeling the adaptation of these practices to the Ukrainian context was conducted, considering the specific characteristics of the country's economic structure. Content analysis was utilized to examine scientific publications, official reports, and data from international organizations, as well as expert assessments of the effectiveness of proposed state support tools. Practical recommendations were substantiated through interpretation of the findings in the context of implementing digital technologies.. Results. It has been established that integrating digital technologies such as blockchain, artificial intelligence, and big data is key to enhancing the transparency and efficiency of state support. Prospects for public–private partnerships were highlighted as an investment mechanism in strategic industries, including the green economy and digital manufacturing. The necessity of expanding grant and subsidy programs for innovative startups, especially in high-tech sectors, was identified. The study substantiated the feasibility of creating a national platform for managing crisis support for businesses. The findings demonstrate that a comprehensive approach adapted to modern challenges can strengthen the financial security of enterprises. Novelty. The proposed models integrate international experience with a focus on digital transformations, including the use of blockchain solutions for transparent monitoring of financial flows, adaptation of crisis financing programs, and support for innovative businesses through subsidies. The originality of the research lies in synthesizing traditional and modern approaches to managing financial security, with a particular emphasis on crisis conditions. Practical value. The study’s results can be utilized to improve Ukraine's state policy in supporting businesses, particularly during periods of economic instability and post–war recovery. The recommendations contribute to enhancing the competitiveness of enterprises, adapting them to global challenges, and minimizing financial risks. |
| Literature: | - 1. Demianyshyn, V.H., Lobodina, Z.M., Horyn, V.P., & Demianyshyn, V.V. (2023). Metodolohichni pidkhody do doslidzhennia derzhavnykh finansovykh resursiv ta finansovoyi bezpeky subiektiv hospodaryuvannia v umovakh reformuvannia upravlinnia publichnymy finansamy. Svit finansiv, (1), 31-47. DOI: 10.35774/sf2023.01.031
- 2. Vasyliev, A., & Halenko, V. (2022). Finansova bezpeka ahrarnykh pidpryiemstv Ukrainy v umovakh pravovoho rezhymu voiennoho stanu. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, (45). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-45-63
- 3. Shopska, Yu. (2023). Ryzyky ta zahrozy poslablennia finansovoi bezpeky sektora maloho pidpryiemnytstva v umovakh nestabilnosti: aspekt polityky rehuliuvannia. Development Service Industry Management, (4), 42-47. https://doi.org/10.31891/dsim-2023-4(6)
- 4. Kunytska-Iliash, M.V. (2022). Derzhavna polityka zabezpechennia rozvytku ta bezpeky priorytetnykh haluzei natsionalnoi ekonomiky Ukrainy: analiz stratehii i prohram. Innovation and Sustainability, 3(24). https://doi.org/10.31649/ins.2022.3.72.78
- 5. Burdin, M.Yu. (2023). Zabezpechennia stabilnosti pidpryiemnytskoi diialnosti yak umova zabezpechennia finansovoi bezpeky v umovakh voiennoho stanu. Aktualni pytannia finansovoi bezpeky. Proceedings from MIIM ‘23 Mizhnarodna naukovo-praktychna konferentsiia «Aktualni pytannia finansovoi bezpeky». (m. Vinnytsia, 27 bereznia, 2023). (pp. 34-37). Vinnytsia: KhNUVS.
- 6. Fedets, A.V. (2023). Derzhavna sotsialno-ekonomichna polityka u sferi finansovoyi bezpeky v konteksti stabilizatsiyi: faktory suspilnykh vyklykiv ta zahroz. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V.I. Vernadkoho,. Ser. Publichne upravlinnia ta administruvannia. T. 34(73), (3), 79-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/TNU-2663-6468/2023.3/13
- 7. Hufbauer, G.C., & Jung, E. (2020). What's new in economic sanctions?. European Economic Review, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103572
- 8. Lippert, B., Perthes, V. (2020). Strategic rivalry between the United States and China: Causes, trajectories, and implications for Europe. SWP Research Pape. Retrieved from https://www.Strategic_rivalry_between_United_States.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
- 9. Jackson J.K., Weiss M.A., Schwarzenberg A.B., & Nelson R.M. Global economic effects of COVID-19: In brief. Congressional Research Service, 2020. Retrieved from https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20200313_R46270_14d1cbe22a876a66147960da61e6f6bc39548dc6.pdf
- 10. Shaw R., Kim Y., & Hua J. Governance, technology and citizen behavior in pandemic: Lessons from COVID-19 in East Asia. Progress in Disaster Science.2020. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061720300272
- 11. Hemmert, M., Cross, A.R., Cheng, Y., & Kim, J.J. The distinctiveness and diversity of entrepreneurial ecosystems in China, Japan, and South Korea: an exploratory analysis. Asian Business & Management,2019 Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41291-019-00070-6
- 12. Sohn, Y. (2019). South Korea under the United States-China rivalry: dynamics of the economic-security nexus in trade policymaking. The Pacific Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2019.1617770
|
Archive