| Annotation: | Methods. In the process of studying the retrospective analysis of intellectual capital and its creative component, the following general scientific methods were applied: scientific abstraction – when establishing the essence of the concept of «intellectual capital», historical and logical – when studying the development of the process of scientific research in the field of studying the phenomenon of «capital» and identifying its forms, as well as the grouping method – when identifying the stages of evolution of views on intellectual capital. Results. A retrospective analysis of the evolution of views on intellectual capital, as well as existing approaches to its definition and classification, are conducted in the article. Given the theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of this category, the stages of the evolution of scientific thought in its study are highlighted. The essence of intellectual capital is considered, its place among all other forms of capital assets is shown. Attention is focused on the fact that the categorical formulation of the concept of «intellectual capital» occurred through the development of ideas about the capital of classical political economy and Marxism, the importance of investing in labor force of the neoclassical approach and the theory of human capital of T. Schultz and G. Becker. The role of intellectual capital in the activities of modern enterprises (micro level) and the functioning of the creative economy (macro level) is demonstrated. Novelty. The novelty of this study can be considered the allocation of stages of evolution of the scientific development of the category of «intellectual capital», which is based on the application of methodological criterion. Practical value. The results of the study have both theoretical and practical significance. Understanding the historical context of the study of intellectual capital allows us to realize the stages and continuity of economic ideas, as well as the change in methodological approaches in the study of certain phenomena and processes. From a practical point of view, knowledge of the patterns of capital development through the isolation of its historically determined forms is useful for effective management of companies and the achievement of economic goals by management. |
| Literature: | - 1. Pylypenko, H.M., & Fedorova, N.Ye. (2020). Nauka yak faktor sotsialno-ekonomichnoho rozvytku suspilstva. Dnipro: NTU «DP».
- 2. Pylypenko, H., Fedorova, N., Lytvynenko, N., & Pylypenko, Yu. (2025). Breakthrough technologies of social transformations: devising an identification methodology. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, Vol. 2, 13(134), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.326555.
- 3. Edvinsson, L., & Malone, N. (1996). Intellectual capital: Realizing your company´s true value by finding its hidden brainpower, New York: Harper Business. 1996. 150 p.
- 4. Stewart, T. (2001). The wealth of knowledge: Intellectual capital and the twentyfirst-century organizations. N. Y. : Doubleday Business.
- 5. Heyets, V.M. (Ed.). (2006). Ukrayina u vymiri ekonomiky znan. Instytut ekonomiky ta prohnozuvannia NAN Ukrayiny. Kyiv: «Osnova».
- 6. Kendyukhov, O.V. (2008). Efectivne upravlinnia intelektualnym kapitalom. Donetsk: DonUEP.
- 7. Hrishnova, O.A. (2014). Liudskyy, intelektualnyy i sotsialnyy kapital Ukrayiny: sutnist, vzayemozviazok, otsinka, napriamy rozvytku. Sotsialno- trudovi vidnosyny: teoriia ta praktyka, (1), 34-40.
- 8. Pylypenko, Yu., Prokhorova, V., Halkiv, L., Koleshchuk, O., & Dubiei, Yu. (2022). Innovative intellectual capital in the system of factors of technical and technological development. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (6), 181-186. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/20226/181
- 9. Pylypenko, Yu.I. (2009). Tekhnolohichna struktura natsionalʹnoyi ekonomiky Ukrayiny ta stratehiya yiyi reformuvannya. Ekonomika i derzhava, Issue 12, 22-24.
- 10. Smit, A. (2001). Doslidzhennya pro pryrodu ta prychyny dobrobutu natsiy. (O. Vasylieva, M. Mezhevikina, 7 A. Malivskyy, Trans.). Kyiv: Roht Roua1.
- 11. Pryntsypy ekonomichnoyi nauky: [Referat pidruchnyka A. Marshalla]. (2001). Kyiv: ADS «UMKTsentr».
- 12. Schultz, T. (1961). Investment in Human Capital. The American Economic Review, Vol. 51, (1), 1-17.
- 13. Becker, G. (1980). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education. 2-ed. Chicago University of Chicago Press.
- 14. Prushkivska, E.V. (2013). Rol zakoniv arkhitektoniky u formuvanni sektoralnoyi struktury. Ekonomichnyy visnyk NHU, 2(42), 21-28.
- 15. Turriago-Hoyos A., Thoene U., Arjoon S. Knowledge Workers and Virtues in Peter Druckers Management Theory. SAGE Open. 2016. № 6 (1). Pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016639631.
- 16. Machlup, F. (1962). The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton University Press.
- 17. Meihami, H., Meihami, B., & Varmaghani, Z. (2013). Role of Intellectual Capital on Firm Performance (Evidence from Iranian Companies). International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, (12), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.12.43
- 18. Brooking, A. (1996). Intellectual Capital: Core Asset for the Third Millennium Enterprise. New York: International Thomson Business Press.
- 19. Sveiby, K. (1997). The Intangible Assets Monitor. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting,. 2(1), 73-97. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb029036
- 20. Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. (2001). Kapitał intelektualny. Poznaj prawdziwą wartość swego przedsiębiorstwa odnajdując jego ukryte korzenie. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo naukowe PWN.
|
Archive